SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: December 30, 2022

Sm subramaniyam judge order மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Sm subramaniyam judge order மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. கருத்து வேறுபாடு காரணமாக பிரிந்து சென்ற மனைவியிடம் இருந்து விவாகரத்து கோரி கணவர், சென்னை பூந்தமல்லி நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தொடர்ந்துள்ளார். திருச்சியில்...

Since the 2nd accused/appellant is on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to secure the 2nd appellant/2nd Accused to commit him in prison to serve out the remaining period of sentence. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/accused, shall be set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (P.N.P.,J.)      (TKRJ)                                                                                23.12.2022 Index:Yes/No ars To The Principal District and Sessions Judge,          The Inspector of Police,     Thanipadi Police Station,     Tiruvannamalai District. The Public Prosecutor,     Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. P.N.PRAKASH, J. and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. ars Pre-delivery Judgment made in Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 23.12.2022

Uncategorized

Since the 2nd accused/appellant is on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to secure the 2nd appellant/2nd Accused to commit him in prison to serve out the remaining period of sentence. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/accused, shall be set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (P.N.P.,J.)      (TKRJ)                                                                                23.12.2022 Index:Yes/No ars To The Principal District and Sessions Judge,          The Inspector of Police,     Thanipadi Police Station,     Tiruvannamalai District. The Public Prosecutor,     Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. P.N.PRAKASH, J. and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. ars Pre-delivery Judgment made in Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 23.12.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 30.11.2022 PRONOUNCED ON:  23.12.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE  MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 Balaji Soundararajan ..   ...

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the Judicial Officers cannot be unnecessarily pressurized by the higher courts. No doubt, in some cases, the higher courts do direct the Trial Courts to expedite the cases, however, it cannot be a routine affair so as to cause unnecessary pressure in the minds of the Judicial Officers, who all are already working in difficult situations. If at all several such directions are issued by the higher courts for the speedy disposal of suits or cases, it may not be practically possible for the Trial Courts to dispose of all such cases. Thus, the pendency involved, and the capacity of the Courts to dispose of the cases are to be taken into consideration by the higher courts while issuing a direction to dispose of the cases in a speedy manner. Complex situations are also to be considered in a practical and pragmatic way, so as to ensure that the Judicial Officers perform their duties in a free and peaceful manner. 6.This being the principles to be followed, the Trial Court in the present case has to take effort to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible and it is to be borne in mind that all cases are to be treated equally and no litigant can claim unnecessary preference unless there is a justification for the speedy disposal. 7.Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. sha                             07.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To Trial Court/learned Principal Sub Judge,     Chengalpattu S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.J., sha         C.R.P.(P.D) No.4058 of 2022 07.12.2022

Uncategorized

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the Judicial Officers cannot be unnecessarily pressurized by the higher courts. No doubt, in some cases, the higher courts do direct the Trial Courts to expedite the cases, however, it cannot be a routine affair so as to cause unnecessary pressure in the minds of the Judicial Officers, who all are already working in difficult situations. If at all several such directions are issued by the higher courts for the speedy disposal of suits or cases, it may not be practically possible for the Trial Courts to dispose of all such cases. Thus, the pendency involved, and the capacity of the Courts to dispose of the cases are to be taken into consideration by the higher courts while issuing a direction to dispose of the cases in a speedy manner. Complex situations are also to be considered in a practical and pragmatic way, so as to ensure that the Judicial Officers perform their duties in a free and peaceful manner. 6.This being the principles to be followed, the Trial Court in the present case has to take effort to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible and it is to be borne in mind that all cases are to be treated equally and no litigant can claim unnecessary preference unless there is a justification for the speedy disposal. 7.Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. sha                             07.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To Trial Court/learned Principal Sub Judge,     Chengalpattu S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.J., sha         C.R.P.(P.D) No.4058 of 2022 07.12.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.(P.D) No. 4058 of 2022 Gangadharan …Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. Sivakumar The Sub Registrar of Assurances 26, MES Road,...

(5) In the event of any failure on the part of the respondent in paying the Interim Maintenance to the minor girl child, the petitioner is at liberty to move the contempt petition before this Court.                               (6) The Interim Maintenance granted in the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is not a bar for the petitioner to claim further maintenance in accordance with law.                                 With the abovesaid directions, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22-12-2022 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Internet : Yes/No. Index: Yes/No. Svn S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Svn To 1.The Sub Judge,    Sub Court,    Poonamallee. 2.The Judge,    Family Court,    Tiruchirappalli. Tr.CMP No.764 of 2022 22-12-2022

Uncategorized

(5) In the event of any failure on the part of the respondent in paying the Interim Maintenance to the minor girl child, the petitioner is at liberty to move the contempt petition before this Court.                               (6) The Interim Maintenance granted in the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is not a bar for the petitioner to claim further maintenance in accordance with law.                                 With the abovesaid directions, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22-12-2022 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Internet : Yes/No. Index: Yes/No. Svn S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Svn To 1.The Sub Judge,    Sub Court,    Poonamallee. 2.The Judge,    Family Court,    Tiruchirappalli. Tr.CMP No.764 of 2022 22-12-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22-12-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Tr.C.M.P.No.764 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.13069 of 2022     P.Geetha                                                                                                                                                 ...

sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

[12/30, 12:54] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை...

With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.  Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. With regard to the impleading petition in WMP.No.15945 of 2022, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the same since a direction has already been issued to the Director, Guindy Campus, University of Madras, Chennai. Accordingly, WMP.No.15945 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed. 30.06.2022 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Sni To 1.The Registrar,    University of Madras,    Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2.Dr.V.Elangovan,    Professor and Head    Department of Biochemistry,    University of Madras,    Guindy Campus, Chennai – 600 025. 3.The Principal Secretary and Member-Syndicate,    University of Madras,    Higher Education Department,    Secretariat, Fort St. George,    Chennai – 600 009. 4.The University Grants Commission,    Rep. by its Secretary,    Bahadurshah Zafar Marg,    New Delhi – 110 002. ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. Sni W.P.No.27375 of 2021 30.06.2022

Uncategorized

With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.  Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. With regard to the impleading petition in WMP.No.15945 of 2022, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the same since a direction has already been issued to the Director, Guindy Campus, University of Madras, Chennai. Accordingly, WMP.No.15945 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed. 30.06.2022 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Sni To 1.The Registrar,    University of Madras,    Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2.Dr.V.Elangovan,    Professor and Head    Department of Biochemistry,    University of Madras,    Guindy Campus, Chennai – 600 025. 3.The Principal Secretary and Member-Syndicate,    University of Madras,    Higher Education Department,    Secretariat, Fort St. George,    Chennai – 600 009. 4.The University Grants Commission,    Rep. by its Secretary,    Bahadurshah Zafar Marg,    New Delhi – 110 002. ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. Sni W.P.No.27375 of 2021 30.06.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.06.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.27375 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.28892 & 28893 of 2021 & 15945 of 2022 Dr.S.Subramanian Professor (Retired), Department...

Uncategorized

Answers to the Issues : I concur with the findings of the Trial Court in respect of the issue No.1 in the Original Suit that the suit is maintainable.  I concur with the findings of the Trial Court that the order made in O.A.No.34 of 1995 and O.A.No.37 of 1985 are final.  I answer the issue No.3 in the Original Suit that the plaintiff is entitled for declaration.  I answer the issue No.4 in the Original Suit that the second defendant is the Hereditary Trustee of the first defendant, endowment.  I answer the issue No.5 in the Original Suit that the plaintiff is also entitled for recovery of possession from the second defendant.  As far as the damages and quantum are concerned, opportunity is given for the plaintiff to comply by way of an application for quantification of the damages as to be recovered.  Therefore, the judgment and decree of the Trial Court does not need any interference. The Result: In the result, this Appeal Suit in A.S.No.397 of 2010 is dismissed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.  Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 14.12.2022 Index        : yes Speaking order grs To The VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, The Section Officer,     V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs      Pre-Delivery Judgment in A.S.No.397 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 14.12.2022 [1] 2011-2-L.W. 1 [2] (2006) 1 SCC 257, para No.7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 02.12.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 14.12.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.397 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Durgai Lakshmi...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com