SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

[24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cTlNBaZ4h88?si=28iOWQQBeYpxNmTX [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Monday appreciated the approach adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu in using preventive detention laws against cybercrime offenders. Justice Sandeep Mehta, while a plea challenging a preventive detention order against a cyber fraud accused, observed – “ This is a good trend coming from the state that preventive detention laws are being used against cyber law offenders. It’s a very welcome approach. Normal criminal laws are not proving successful against these offenders.”

Uncategorized

[24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cTlNBaZ4h88?si=28iOWQQBeYpxNmTX [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Monday appreciated the approach adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu in using preventive detention laws against cybercrime offenders. Justice Sandeep Mehta, while a plea challenging a preventive detention order against a cyber fraud accused, observed – “ This is a good trend coming from the state that preventive detention laws are being used against cyber law offenders. It’s a very welcome approach. Normal criminal laws are not proving successful against these offenders.”

[24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cTlNBaZ4h88?si=28iOWQQBeYpxNmTX [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Monday appreciated the approach adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu in using preventive detention laws against cybercrime offenders. Justice Sandeep Mehta, while...

[24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ofnO4w00D6g?si=-dsA-DGP5OYUhCg1 [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers The apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government in January on the case filed by a Delhi woman

Uncategorized

[24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ofnO4w00D6g?si=-dsA-DGP5OYUhCg1 [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers The apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government in January on the case filed by a Delhi woman

[24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ofnO4w00D6g?si=-dsA-DGP5OYUhCg1 [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers The apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi...

[24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Kadh7tvIJ1U?si=bNytR-vhAmtKld3b [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court pulls up authorities for remaining mute spectators to illegal constructions Due to such inaction, greedy men are emboldened to construct buildings unauthorisedly, converting fertile lands into a concrete jungle, the Court lamented.

Uncategorized

[24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Kadh7tvIJ1U?si=bNytR-vhAmtKld3b [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court pulls up authorities for remaining mute spectators to illegal constructions Due to such inaction, greedy men are emboldened to construct buildings unauthorisedly, converting fertile lands into a concrete jungle, the Court lamented.

[24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Kadh7tvIJ1U?si=bNytR-vhAmtKld3b [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court pulls up authorities for remaining mute spectators to illegal constructions Due to such inaction, greedy men are emboldened to construct buildings unauthorisedly, converting fertile...

[24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/8w8Ir1PhjU0?si=buTvmEFzIubsmEYx [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court orders criminal, disciplinary, and contempt proceedings against lawyer for abusing, threatening judges Justice P.T. Asha orders criminal action as the lawyer had prevented the police from executing an NBW; directs Bar Council to initiate disciplinary action for his conduct in court

Uncategorized

[24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/8w8Ir1PhjU0?si=buTvmEFzIubsmEYx [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court orders criminal, disciplinary, and contempt proceedings against lawyer for abusing, threatening judges Justice P.T. Asha orders criminal action as the lawyer had prevented the police from executing an NBW; directs Bar Council to initiate disciplinary action for his conduct in court

[24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/8w8Ir1PhjU0?si=buTvmEFzIubsmEYx [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court orders criminal, disciplinary, and contempt proceedings against lawyer for abusing, threatening judges Justice P.T. Asha orders criminal action as the lawyer had prevented the...

Justice Anand Venkatesh was referring to T. Wilson v. District Collector, Kanyakumari Dist and Ors. (2021) where a coordinate bench had held that a religious right cannot be claimed to be absolute and prayer meetings

Uncategorized

Justice Anand Venkatesh was referring to T. Wilson v. District Collector, Kanyakumari Dist and Ors. (2021) where a coordinate bench had held that a religious right cannot be claimed to be absolute and prayer meetings

The Madras High Court has reiterated that a house cannot be converted into a prayer hall without necessary permission from the authorities. “ It is clear from the above judgment that conducting prayer meetings in...

MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE   W.P(MD)No.3482 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2464 of 2025   M.Daniel Simiyon Sudan                                                 … Petitioner Vs     1. The District Collector,

Uncategorized

MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE   W.P(MD)No.3482 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2464 of 2025   M.Daniel Simiyon Sudan                                                 … Petitioner Vs     1. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT                                            DATED : 10.06.2025   CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE   W.P(MD)No.3482 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)...

23.In the present writ petition, regarding the facts of the present writ petition, the respondents are directed to initiate enforcement action by following the procedures as contemplated under the Act and Rules and demolish the unauthorized constructions, if any, identified, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 24.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.  Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 25.Registry is directed to list the matter on 07.08.2025 for reporting compliance.                                                              [S.M.S.,  J.]          [A.D.M.C., J.]                                                                                                                     10.06.2025          Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No LR To 1.  The District Collector,Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli. 2.  The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.  The Block Development Officer, Manikandam Union, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.  The Village President,Punganur Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli. 5.  The State of Tamil Nadu, The Chief Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. LR W.P(MD)No.3482 of 2025   10.06.2025

Uncategorized

23.In the present writ petition, regarding the facts of the present writ petition, the respondents are directed to initiate enforcement action by following the procedures as contemplated under the Act and Rules and demolish the unauthorized constructions, if any, identified, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 24.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.  Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 25.Registry is directed to list the matter on 07.08.2025 for reporting compliance.                                                              [S.M.S.,  J.]          [A.D.M.C., J.]                                                                                                                     10.06.2025          Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No LR To 1.  The District Collector,Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli. 2.  The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.  The Block Development Officer, Manikandam Union, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.  The Village President,Punganur Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli. 5.  The State of Tamil Nadu, The Chief Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. LR W.P(MD)No.3482 of 2025   10.06.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.    P(MD)No.3482 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD) No.2464 of 2025 M.Daniel Simiyon Sudan                             ...

view of the above, this Court is inclined to set aside the order dated 04.04.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.36253 of 2024 in S.C.No.426 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Court, Chennai.  Accordingly, it is hereby set aside and the petitioner is discharged from the charge under Section 306 of IPC. 12.        In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09.06.2025 Index   : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1.               The I Additional Sessions Judge,Chennai. 2.               The Inspector of Police (L &O),F-2, Egmore Police Station, Egmore, Chenani – 600 008. 3.               The Public Prosecutor,High Court, Madras.  of 11 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.R.C.No.689 of 2025 09.06.2025  of 11

Uncategorized

view of the above, this Court is inclined to set aside the order dated 04.04.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.36253 of 2024 in S.C.No.426 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Court, Chennai.  Accordingly, it is hereby set aside and the petitioner is discharged from the charge under Section 306 of IPC. 12.        In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09.06.2025 Index   : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1.               The I Additional Sessions Judge,Chennai. 2.               The Inspector of Police (L &O),F-2, Egmore Police Station, Egmore, Chenani – 600 008. 3.               The Public Prosecutor,High Court, Madras.  of 11 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.R.C.No.689 of 2025 09.06.2025  of 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.689 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.10462 of 2025 K.Mohanraj                      …..           Petitioner Vs The State, rep by its Inspector of...

Murugan temple   Additional Public Prosecutor      JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

Uncategorized

Murugan temple   Additional Public Prosecutor      JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A(MD)No.1673 of 2025 and C.M.P(MD)No.9366 of 2025 M.Arasupandi … Appellant /                                      ...

Call Now ButtonCALL ME