SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

The Madras High Court recently directed a taxpayer to file a revocation application to reinstate their GST registration, which was cancelled due to alleged suspicious transactions in their bank and portal. Here’s a breakdown of the case¹: – *Background*: The taxpayer’s GST registration was cancelled, prompting them to approach the Madras High Court. – *Court’s Directive*: The court directed the taxpayer to file a revocation application along with supporting documentation. – *Procedure*: The department will issue a notice for a personal hearing within three days of receiving the application. A reasoned order will be passed within two weeks after the hearing, ensuring the taxpayer is given an opportunity to present their case. – *Precedent*: This decision aligns with previous judgments where the Madras High Court has allowed taxpayers to apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under certain circumstances, such as when the taxpayer has a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the application.² *Key Takeaways* – *Revocation Application*: Taxpayers can apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under Section 30 of the GST Act. – *Supporting Documentation*: The taxpayer must provide supporting documentation to substantiate their claim. – *Opportunity for Hearing*: The department must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order. – *Timeframe*: The department is required to pass a reasoned order within two weeks after the hearing. It’s essential for taxpayers to understand the procedures and timelines for revocation of cancellation of registration to ensure compliance with GST regulations.

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court recently directed a taxpayer to file a revocation application to reinstate their GST registration, which was cancelled due to alleged suspicious transactions in their bank and portal. Here’s a breakdown of the case¹: – *Background*: The taxpayer’s GST registration was cancelled, prompting them to approach the Madras High Court. – *Court’s Directive*: The court directed the taxpayer to file a revocation application along with supporting documentation. – *Procedure*: The department will issue a notice for a personal hearing within three days of receiving the application. A reasoned order will be passed within two weeks after the hearing, ensuring the taxpayer is given an opportunity to present their case. – *Precedent*: This decision aligns with previous judgments where the Madras High Court has allowed taxpayers to apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under certain circumstances, such as when the taxpayer has a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the application.² *Key Takeaways* – *Revocation Application*: Taxpayers can apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under Section 30 of the GST Act. – *Supporting Documentation*: The taxpayer must provide supporting documentation to substantiate their claim. – *Opportunity for Hearing*: The department must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order. – *Timeframe*: The department is required to pass a reasoned order within two weeks after the hearing. It’s essential for taxpayers to understand the procedures and timelines for revocation of cancellation of registration to ensure compliance with GST regulations.

The Madras High Court recently directed a taxpayer to file a revocation application to reinstate their GST registration, which was cancelled due to alleged suspicious transactions in their bank and portal. Here’s a breakdown...

[12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹: – *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court. – *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view. – *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision. Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice. [12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy

Uncategorized

[12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹: – *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court. – *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view. – *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision. Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice. [12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy

[12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment...

Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where: – *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application. – *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.

Uncategorized

Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where: – *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application. – *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.

[12/05, 07:50] sekarreporter1: Lordship Justice Nakkiran, referencing the division bench’s observations, concluded that the review application filed by News Nation was “not at all maintainable.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/lordship-justice-nakkiran-referencing-the-division-benchs-observations-concluded-that-the-review-application-filed-by-news-nation-was-not-at-all-maintainable/ [12/05, 07:50] Meta AI: This appears to be...

Meta AI: This appears to be a court case where: – *Contempt Petition*: A petition was filed against the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu. – *Fine Imposed*: A fine of ₹5 lakhs was imposed. – *Judges*: The case was heard by MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE. – *Petitioner*: Elephant G. Rajendran, an advocate, filed the contempt petition

Uncategorized

Meta AI: This appears to be a court case where: – *Contempt Petition*: A petition was filed against the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu. – *Fine Imposed*: A fine of ₹5 lakhs was imposed. – *Judges*: The case was heard by MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE. – *Petitioner*: Elephant G. Rajendran, an advocate, filed the contempt petition

[12/05, 07:51] sekarreporter1: 5 lakhs fine MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition No.556 of 2024 and Sub Appl Nos.174, 175 of 2024 and 72 of 2025 Elephant G. Rajendran Advocate, Plot...

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.A.(MD)No.559 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.13186 of 2023 The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The District Collector, Madurai. … Appellant / Appellant / Defendant -Vs-

Uncategorized

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.A.(MD)No.559 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.13186 of 2023 The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The District Collector, Madurai. … Appellant / Appellant / Defendant -Vs-

Skip to content sekarreporter.com 9445430817 Menu MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN andTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHIS.A.(MD)No.559 of 2023 andC.M.P(MD)No.13186 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 20.02.2025 Pronounced on : 25.02.2025 CORAM:...

Judges Nisha Banu and S Srimathy passed the orders on the plea moved by C Chellamuthu of Dindigul who stated that the NIRF rankings are calculated merely based on the data provided by the educational institutions on their website without any verification or auditing.

Uncategorized

Judges Nisha Banu and S Srimathy passed the orders on the plea moved by C Chellamuthu of Dindigul who stated that the NIRF rankings are calculated merely based on the data provided by the educational institutions on their website without any verification or auditing.

F MADURAI: Lifting the interim stay on the release of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) rank list for this year, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently dismissed a PIL petition...

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy found the petitioner’s explanation reasonable and sincere, especially in light of the reliance on expert advice. It, therefore, canceled the cancellation order and

Uncategorized

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy found the petitioner’s explanation reasonable and sincere, especially in light of the reliance on expert advice. It, therefore, canceled the cancellation order and

”   Auditor’s Advice on Rs. 20L Threshold Resulted in GST Registration Cancellation: Madras HC Orders Reopening of Portal for Return Filing The bench canceled the GST registration cancellation order and directed the department...

We the People” என்ற புத்தகம் எழுதியவர் யார்?

Uncategorized

We the People” என்ற புத்தகம் எழுதியவர் யார்?

CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY MCQ question 1. We the People” என்ற புத்தகம் எழுதியவர் யார்? A. என்.பி.பல்கிவாலா B. பிளேட்டோ C. மெக்ஸ்வெல் D. மேல்கண்ட எவரும் அல்ல 2. கீழ்க்காணும் எந்த வகையான சாட்சியங்கள் இந்த சட்டத்தில் அங்கீகரிக்கப்படுகின்றன? A. வாய்மொழி சாட்சி...

Call Now ButtonCALL ME