SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

High Court recently held that power of attorney holder’s incompetence to institute a complaint alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be raised as a ground to assail conviction at the stage of revision, if not raised earlier.

Uncategorized

High Court recently held that power of attorney holder’s incompetence to institute a complaint alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be raised as a ground to assail conviction at the stage of revision, if not raised earlier.

The Kerala High Court recently held that power of attorney holder’s incompetence to institute a complaint alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be raised as a ground...

“Political Sensitivity” No Excuse to Silence Critics: Madras High Court Slams TN Police’s Vague X Post Blocking Notice https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/political-sensitivity-no-excuse-to-silence-critics-madras-high-court-slams-vague-blocking-notice-against-vhps-x-posts-1593033

Uncategorized

“Political Sensitivity” No Excuse to Silence Critics: Madras High Court Slams TN Police’s Vague X Post Blocking Notice https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/political-sensitivity-no-excuse-to-silence-critics-madras-high-court-slams-vague-blocking-notice-against-vhps-x-posts-1593033

“Political Sensitivity” No Excuse to Silence Critics: Madras High Court Slams TN Police’s Vague X Post Blocking Notice https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/political-sensitivity-no-excuse-to-silence-critics-madras-high-court-slams-vague-blocking-notice-against-vhps-x-posts-1593033

STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 18 th May, 2026 has approved the following proposals for appointment of below-named persons as Judges in the Madras High Court: Proposal dated 04th November, 2025 (i) Dr. P. Murugan, (ii) Mrs. M. D. Sumathi, (iii) Mrs. S. Alli, (iv) Mrs. C. Thirumagal Chandrasekar, (v) Shri Dharmalingam Lingeswaran, and (vi) Shri Karthikeyan Balathandayutham. Proposal dated 21st November, 2025 (i) Shri Natarajan Ramesh, (ii) Shri G.K. Muthukumaar, (iii) Shri Ramakrishnan Rajesh Vivekananthan, (iv) Shri Sankaranarayanan Raveekumar, (v) Shri Nagarajan Dilip Kumar, and (vi) Shri Ellappan Manoharan, Proposal dated 07th December, 2025 (i) Shri Krishnaswamy Govindarajan, (ii) Shri Rajnish Pathiyil, (iii) Shri K. Appadurai @ Kandavel Appadurai, and (iv) Mrs. Ramasamy Anitha Proposal dated 10th December, 2025 (i) Shri Shanmugam Karthikeyan, (ii) Shri Baluchamy Murugesan, and (iii) Shri N. Gunasekaran. ==============

Uncategorized

STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 18 th May, 2026 has approved the following proposals for appointment of below-named persons as Judges in the Madras High Court: Proposal dated 04th November, 2025 (i) Dr. P. Murugan, (ii) Mrs. M. D. Sumathi, (iii) Mrs. S. Alli, (iv) Mrs. C. Thirumagal Chandrasekar, (v) Shri Dharmalingam Lingeswaran, and (vi) Shri Karthikeyan Balathandayutham. Proposal dated 21st November, 2025 (i) Shri Natarajan Ramesh, (ii) Shri G.K. Muthukumaar, (iii) Shri Ramakrishnan Rajesh Vivekananthan, (iv) Shri Sankaranarayanan Raveekumar, (v) Shri Nagarajan Dilip Kumar, and (vi) Shri Ellappan Manoharan, Proposal dated 07th December, 2025 (i) Shri Krishnaswamy Govindarajan, (ii) Shri Rajnish Pathiyil, (iii) Shri K. Appadurai @ Kandavel Appadurai, and (iv) Mrs. Ramasamy Anitha Proposal dated 10th December, 2025 (i) Shri Shanmugam Karthikeyan, (ii) Shri Baluchamy Murugesan, and (iii) Shri N. Gunasekaran. ==============

STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 18 th May, 2026 has approved the following proposals for appointment of below-named persons as Judges in the Madras High Court: Proposal dated 04th...

[19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2056614548547989656 [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: *Senior Congress Leader & VOT President C.Rajashekaran,Advocate congratulated & greeted State PP Sr.Advocate.John Sathyan in laters office on 18/5/26.*

Uncategorized

[19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2056614548547989656 [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: *Senior Congress Leader & VOT President C.Rajashekaran,Advocate congratulated & greeted State PP Sr.Advocate.John Sathyan in laters office on 18/5/26.*

[19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2056614548547989656 [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: *Senior Congress Leader & VOT President C.Rajashekaran,Advocate congratulated & greeted State PP Sr.Advocate.John Sathyan in laters office on 18/5/26.*

Uncategorized

Breaking மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட குற்றவாளிகளை விடுதலை செய்த சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அனைவருக்கும் ஆயுள் தண்டனை வழங்கி உத்தரவு விசாரணை நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய தண்டனையை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் ரத்து செய்தது மிகப்பெரிய தவறு எனவும் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு வழங்கியுள்ளது

Breaking மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட குற்றவாளிகளை விடுதலை செய்த சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அனைவருக்கும் ஆயுள் தண்டனை வழங்கி உத்தரவு விசாரணை நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய தண்டனையை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் ரத்து செய்தது மிகப்பெரிய தவறு எனவும் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு...

Uncategorized

The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In the digital age, blocking a URL may silence a speaker, erase a viewpoint and impoverish public debate. Therefore, such power must be exercised with precision, restraint and reasons,” the court added.

[19/05, 08:45] sekarreporter1: The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In...

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/high-court-registrar-general-cannot-suo-motu-initiate-disciplinary-action-against-judicial-officer-supreme-court-534611 [19/05, 08:32] Meta AI: That LiveLaw article covers a *Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 18, 2026*, clarifying who can start disciplinary action against judicial officers.

Uncategorized

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/high-court-registrar-general-cannot-suo-motu-initiate-disciplinary-action-against-judicial-officer-supreme-court-534611 [19/05, 08:32] Meta AI: That LiveLaw article covers a *Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 18, 2026*, clarifying who can start disciplinary action against judicial officers.

[19/05, 08:32] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/high-court-registrar-general-cannot-suo-motu-initiate-disciplinary-action-against-judicial-officer-supreme-court-534611 [19/05, 08:32] Meta AI: That LiveLaw article covers a *Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 18, 2026*, clarifying who can start disciplinary action against judicial officers. *1. Case: _High Court...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com