SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

R Ganesan District Judge retired :- It is not uncommon in India that judicial officers from the lowest rank to the highest institution of CJI thinking themselves that the power vested to sit in an elevated positioning than that of a lwyer or a litigant is meant to disgrace or treat the advocates to offend them or use harsh or in dignified and inappropriate languages ot gesticulations . The elevated position to the judges in a court of law is to authorise them the

[17/05, 09:12] Ganesan Judge: R Ganesan District Judge retired :- It is not uncommon in India that judicial officers from the lowest rank to the highest institution of CJI thinking themselves that the power...

07:45] sekarreporter1: Advocate john sathyan is appointed as state public prosecutor by TVK. He was recomended by advocate general Vijay narayanan. A background of him.

Uncategorized

07:45] sekarreporter1: Advocate john sathyan is appointed as state public prosecutor by TVK. He was recomended by advocate general Vijay narayanan. A background of him.

[17/05, 07:45] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2055524658884288815 [17/05, 07:45] sekarreporter1: Advocate john sathyan is appointed as state public prosecutor by TVK. He was recomended by formar advocate general Vijay narayanan. A background of him. On Feb 2022...

Uncategorized

Ganesan Judge – Comments on Family Courts Act, 1984* _Sekar Reporter post – key legal points raised_ *1. Core arguments made by Judge Ganesan* *A. Publication ban – privacy protection* 1. _“The very mandate of the Family Court Act 1984 is that

[16/05, 19:36] sekarreporter1: [16/05, 19:35] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxOgcHwUAaUCq-CXYR9iqxFVqOBTaZdZ8d?si=DSCJWspF7UniUei3 [16/05, 19:35] sekarreporter1: *Ganesan Judge – Comments on Family Courts Act, 1984* _Sekar Reporter post – key legal points raised_ *1. Core arguments made by Judge Ganesan*...

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR OA Nos.455 & 456 of 2026 and A Nos.1036 & 2130 of 2026 and OA Nos.183 to 185 of 2024 in CS No. 54 of 2024 1. M.A.M.R. Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2. Geetha Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR OA Nos.455 & 456 of 2026 and A Nos.1036 & 2130 of 2026 and OA Nos.183 to 185 of...

Uncategorized

Justice N. Senthilkumar passes the order following a few applications filed by industrialist M.A.M.R. Muthiah, his wife Geetha Muthiah, and five others

[17/05, 07:08] sekarreporter1: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/madras-high-court-appoints-industrialist-vijayakumar-reddy-as-interim-administrator-of-chettinad-vidyashram-school/article70986015.ece [17/05, 07:08] Meta AI: *Madras High Court appoints industrialist P. Vijayakumar Reddy as interim administrator of Chettinad Vidyashram school* _The Hindu | May 15, 2026_ *1. What happened* *Trigger*: Secretary...

Uncategorized

Ganesan Judge: Sir , the very mandate of the family court Act 1984 is that it strictly prohibits the very publication of the family court proceeding in any website or portals of the family court as it would amounts to or attempts to invade the privacy of the people who comes to family courts for reliefs under their personal law . As india is predominantly populated with hindu majoritarian secular country by law established, even the right royal way of entry of advocates to prosecute and defend a matter is restricted rather prohibited and the lawyer can appear only to assist the court as the friend of the court and not as lawyer of either side as the family courts Act given such. omelets discretion to the presiding officer of the family courts in family court area and the other courts such safeguards is not available and it is still an anomaly persisting in a family court area and a non- family court area . Due this anomaly, from the decision of family fort appeal lies to high court to be dealt by two judge bench and where as if the same power is exercised by a sub judge in a non family court area , the appeal would lie only the district court . Though the entry of lawyers are completely under the rigorous filtering mechanism of the family court judges , no judge in family court used to refuse the petition filed by the parties seeking to nominate and appoint counsel either to prosecute or defend a matter before family courts . The restricted entry has been more or less made as a wind and the family courts are the place flooded with lawyers

[16/05, 19:12] Ganesan Judge: Sir , the very mandate of the family court Act 1984 is that it strictly prohibits the very publication of the family court proceeding in any website or portals of...

sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/section-of-media-misquoted-me-criticised-only-those-who-join-professions-with-fake-degrees-cji-surya-kant-clarifies-remarks-on-youth-534448 [16/05, 19:03] Meta AI: *“Section Of Media Misquoted Me, Criticised Only Those Who Join Professions With Fake Degrees: CJI Surya Kant Clarifies Remarks On Youth”* _LiveLaw | May 16, 2026, 3:46 PM_

Uncategorized

sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/section-of-media-misquoted-me-criticised-only-those-who-join-professions-with-fake-degrees-cji-surya-kant-clarifies-remarks-on-youth-534448 [16/05, 19:03] Meta AI: *“Section Of Media Misquoted Me, Criticised Only Those Who Join Professions With Fake Degrees: CJI Surya Kant Clarifies Remarks On Youth”* _LiveLaw | May 16, 2026, 3:46 PM_

[16/05, 19:03] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/section-of-media-misquoted-me-criticised-only-those-who-join-professions-with-fake-degrees-cji-surya-kant-clarifies-remarks-on-youth-534448 [16/05, 19:03] Meta AI: *“Section Of Media Misquoted Me, Criticised Only Those Who Join Professions With Fake Degrees: CJI Surya Kant Clarifies Remarks On Youth”* _LiveLaw | May 16, 2026,...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com