You may also like...
-
justice G Jayachandran and justice N Senthilkumar observed that, on perusal of the records, the court found no merit in this petition. The court was also able to visualise that this petition was filed with an ulterior motive to prevent the govt from establishing a modernised crematorium to avoid air pollution. Therefore, the court was not inclined to entertain this public interest litigation, the judges observed, and dismissed the petition.”
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 1, 2026
-
Justice N Sentilkumar noted that there could not be a blanket order restricting a person from exercising their right to express their views. The court noted that if Rangaraj wanted to restrain posts against him, he had to establish that there was commercial exploitation of his personality rights.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 9, 2026
-