justice G Jayachandran and justice N Senthilkumar observed that, on perusal of the records, the court found no merit in this petition. The court was also able to visualise that this petition was filed with an ulterior motive to prevent the govt from establishing a modernised crematorium to avoid air pollution. Therefore, the court was not inclined to entertain this public interest litigation, the judges observed, and dismissed the petition.”
“justice G Jayachandran and justice N Senthilkumar observed that, on perusal of the records, the court found no merit in this petition. The court was also able to visualise that this petition was filed with an ulterior motive to prevent the govt from establishing a modernised crematorium to avoid air pollution. Therefore, the court was not inclined to entertain this public interest litigation, the judges observed, and dismissed the petition.”
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/hc-junks-plea-against-electric-crematorium-in-theni-village/articleshow/127826543.cms#:~:text=justice%20G%20Jayachandran,dismissed%20the%20petition.
![The judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in S.C.No.600/2017 dated 12.02.2020 is modified accordingly. (iii) All the above sentences are ordered to run concurrently. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/A1, A4 & A5 is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. [J.N.B., J.] & [N.A.V., J.] 08.11.2022 Index : Yes Internet : Yes PJL To The Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. J.NISHA BANU, J AND N.ANAND VENKATESH, J PJL Judgment made in Crl. A.(MD)Nos.168, 180 & 204 of 2020 and 386 of 2021](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
