Follow:
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 196 of 2026 D.Veerappan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Western Range, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption, No. 293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai – 600 016. 3. The Engineer – in -Chief and Chief Engineer (General), Water Resource Department/ Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 4. Chief Engineer, Chennai Region, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
- CM talks about women safety, reality differs: Court after Vijay govt’s report mix-up The Madras High Court questioned authorities after a hospital submitted an abortion fitness report instead of the medical details it had sought. The mix-up prompted Justice Victoria Gowri to raise concerns over the enquiry process and women’s safety claims in the state.
- NOTIFICATION NO. 124 / 2026 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU will sit in a Full Bench at 4.30 P.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI will sit single at 10.30 A.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the Madurai Bench cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. III. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN will sit single in His Lordship’s Chambers at 2.30 P.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the Madurai Bench cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. IV. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN will sit single at 10.30 A.M. on 11.06.2026 in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court at Madurai and take up the Principal Seat cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. V. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN is not sitting in Court on 11.06.2026. VI. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR will sit single after the Division Bench sitting on 11.06.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. // BY ORDER // HIGH COURT, MADRAS Dr. A. RAMESH DATED : 10.06.2026 REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
- “justice P Velmurugan and justice B Pugalendhi observed that there are serious allegations that the candidates are obtaining fake degree certificates in a fraudulent manner from various universities in order to avail the benefits of PSTM reservation.” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/ensure-probe-into-fake-degree-certificates-reaches-logical-end-hc-directs-dvac/articleshow/131643038.cms#:~:text=justice%20P%20Velmurugan%20and%20justice%20B%20Pugalendhi%20observed%20that%20there%20are%20serious%20allegations%20that%20the%20candidates%20are%20obtaining%20fake%20degree%20certificates%20in%20a%20fraudulent%20manner%20from%20various%20universities%20in%20order%20to%20avail%20the%20benefits%20of%20PSTM%20reservation.
- “HomeIndia SC pulls up Madras HC for granting ‘civil relief’ through anticipatory bail order The apex court set aside the specific condition imposed by the High Court restraining interference in the disputed property till the disposal of the suit. Ashish Tripathi DHNS Last Updated : 10 June 2026, 10:06 IST ADVERTISEMENT Join Us As Trusted 0 An AI-generated image New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ruled that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a High Court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a parallel pending civil suit. ADVERTISEMENT A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a February 24, 2026, order of the Madras High Court. The High Court had granted anticipatory bail to Irulandi and others in connection with an FIR registered at Perunazhi Police Station in Madurai for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 329(3), 324(4), 115(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. However, it imposed a condition directing the appellants and co-accused not to interfere with the disputed property until the conclusion of a civil suit filed by the complainant.” https://www.deccanherald.com/india/sc-pulls-up-madras-hc-for-granting-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-order-4034028#:~:text=HomeIndia,by%20the%20complainant.
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 196 of 2026 D.Veerappan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Western Range, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption, No. 293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai – 600 016. 3. The Engineer – in -Chief and Chief Engineer (General), Water Resource Department/ Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 4. Chief Engineer, Chennai Region, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
- CM talks about women safety, reality differs: Court after Vijay govt’s report mix-up The Madras High Court questioned authorities after a hospital submitted an abortion fitness report instead of the medical details it had sought. The mix-up prompted Justice Victoria Gowri to raise concerns over the enquiry process and women’s safety claims in the state.
- NOTIFICATION NO. 124 / 2026 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU will sit in a Full Bench at 4.30 P.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI will sit single at 10.30 A.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the Madurai Bench cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. III. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN will sit single in His Lordship’s Chambers at 2.30 P.M. on 11.06.2026 and take up the Madurai Bench cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. IV. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN will sit single at 10.30 A.M. on 11.06.2026 in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court at Madurai and take up the Principal Seat cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. V. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN is not sitting in Court on 11.06.2026. VI. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR will sit single after the Division Bench sitting on 11.06.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. // BY ORDER // HIGH COURT, MADRAS Dr. A. RAMESH DATED : 10.06.2026 REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
- “justice P Velmurugan and justice B Pugalendhi observed that there are serious allegations that the candidates are obtaining fake degree certificates in a fraudulent manner from various universities in order to avail the benefits of PSTM reservation.” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/ensure-probe-into-fake-degree-certificates-reaches-logical-end-hc-directs-dvac/articleshow/131643038.cms#:~:text=justice%20P%20Velmurugan%20and%20justice%20B%20Pugalendhi%20observed%20that%20there%20are%20serious%20allegations%20that%20the%20candidates%20are%20obtaining%20fake%20degree%20certificates%20in%20a%20fraudulent%20manner%20from%20various%20universities%20in%20order%20to%20avail%20the%20benefits%20of%20PSTM%20reservation.
- “HomeIndia SC pulls up Madras HC for granting ‘civil relief’ through anticipatory bail order The apex court set aside the specific condition imposed by the High Court restraining interference in the disputed property till the disposal of the suit. Ashish Tripathi DHNS Last Updated : 10 June 2026, 10:06 IST ADVERTISEMENT Join Us As Trusted 0 An AI-generated image New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ruled that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a High Court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a parallel pending civil suit. ADVERTISEMENT A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a February 24, 2026, order of the Madras High Court. The High Court had granted anticipatory bail to Irulandi and others in connection with an FIR registered at Perunazhi Police Station in Madurai for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 329(3), 324(4), 115(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. However, it imposed a condition directing the appellants and co-accused not to interfere with the disputed property until the conclusion of a civil suit filed by the complainant.” https://www.deccanherald.com/india/sc-pulls-up-madras-hc-for-granting-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-order-4034028#:~:text=HomeIndia,by%20the%20complainant.