Monthly Archive: August 2025

Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan observed, “When the Appellate Court finds that due to practical reasons, such appeals cannot be disposed of expeditiously, the Appellate Court must show special concern in the matter of suspending the sentence so as to make the appeal right, meaningful and effective. At the same time, the appellate courts can impose similar conditions when appeal is granted.

Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan observed, “When the Appellate Court finds that due to practical reasons, such appeals cannot be disposed of expeditiously, the Appellate Court must show special concern in the matter of suspending the sentence so as to make the appeal right, meaningful and effective. At the same time, the appellate courts can impose similar conditions when appeal is granted.

Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan observed, “When the Appellate Court finds that due to practical reasons, such appeals cannot be disposed of expeditiously, the Appellate Court must show special concern in the...

“If the government is not able to spare a sum of Rs 25,42,21,775 for additional infrastructure to the high court in the state, it reflects the poor state of affairs prevailing in the state,” a bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan remarked.

“If the government is not able to spare a sum of Rs 25,42,21,775 for additional infrastructure to the high court in the state, it reflects the poor state of affairs prevailing in the state,” a bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan remarked.

[10/08, 11:48] Sekarreporter: “Follow Us MADURAI: Expressing displeasure at the state government’s delay in releasing funds to the tune of Rs 25.4 crore towards acquisition of 9.5 acres of temple land in front of...

Senior Standing Counsel for DGGI Ms. Revathi Manivannan defended the department’s position, arguing that successive attachment orders had been passed by the DGGI, which were not challenged by the petitioner. She submitted that the department had the authority to issue successive provisional attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act without any prohibition. Ms. Revathi Manivannan further informed the court that after issuing show cause notices to the petitioner and obtaining his reply, the department had subsequently passed orders for reversal of tax credit.

Senior Standing Counsel for DGGI Ms. Revathi Manivannan defended the department’s position, arguing that successive attachment orders had been passed by the DGGI, which were not challenged by the petitioner. She submitted that the department had the authority to issue successive provisional attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act without any prohibition. Ms. Revathi Manivannan further informed the court that after issuing show cause notices to the petitioner and obtaining his reply, the department had subsequently passed orders for reversal of tax credit.

[10/08, 11:01] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx1hJtZDSP82hhiW–kDTWtH9O7NQajRdA?si=1C822c5EK2kU3ErE [10/08, 11:01] Sekarreporter: Chennai, August 4: The Madras High Court has ruled that a provisional attachment order issued by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) in 2021 has automatically...

HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,  CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No.10252 of 2025 and WMP No.11541 of 2025 K.Venkatesan Proprietor of  Wintel Marketing and Services  New No.55, Old No.21, 1st Floor, New Boag Road, Thyagaraya Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.	The Principal Additional Director General     Directorate General of GST Intelligence     (DGGI) Chennai Zonal Unit     5th and 8th Floor, Tower II     BSNL Building, 16, Greams Road,     Chennai – 600 006. 2.	City Union Bank Limited     Thiruvanmiyur Branch      No.159, South Avenue,       Kamaraj Nagar, Thiruvalluvar

HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No.10252 of 2025 and WMP No.11541 of 2025 K.Venkatesan Proprietor of Wintel Marketing and Services New No.55, Old No.21, 1st Floor, New Boag Road, Thyagaraya Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Principal Additional Director General Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) Chennai Zonal Unit 5th and 8th Floor, Tower II BSNL Building, 16, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. 2. City Union Bank Limited Thiruvanmiyur Branch No.159, South Avenue, Kamaraj Nagar, Thiruvalluvar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No.10252 of 2025 and WMP No.11541 of...

என்னை உருவாக்கிய எனது தாய் தந்தைக்கு முதல் நன்றி எனது அப்பா வக்கீல்  அம்மா  teacher / அப்பா இறந்த்த பிறகு தாய் ஆலோசனை பெயரில் வக்கீலானேன்

என்னை உருவாக்கிய எனது தாய் தந்தைக்கு முதல் நன்றி எனது அப்பா வக்கீல் அம்மா teacher / அப்பா இறந்த்த பிறகு தாய் ஆலோசனை பெயரில் வக்கீலானேன்

[10/08, 09:27] Sekarreporter: [10/08, 09:29] Sekarreporter: என்னை உருவாக்கிய எனது தாய் தந்தைக்கு முதல் நன்றி எனது அப்பா வக்கீல் அம்மா teacher / அப்பா இறந்த்த பிறகு தாய் ஆலோசனை பெயரில் வக்கீலானேன்

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan clarified that the grievance regarding bank recovery was misconceived, as the SARFAESI proceedings had only reached the Section 13(2) notice stage, which was not challenged. i act /Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan clarified that the grievance regarding bank recovery was misconceived, as the SARFAESI proceedings had only reached the Section 13(2) notice stage, which was not challenged. i act /Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI

Top Home »Top Stories »Attachment GST S. 83… Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order] The provisional attachment order passed by...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com