Sekarreporter law —[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) MLJ 191 : Anil kumar jinabhai Patel vs pravinchandra jinabhai Patel: Arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 (3) : The delivery of an arbitral award under section 31 (5) of the act is not a matter of mere formality, it is a matter of substance , limitation period of three months cannot be condoned beyond thirty days [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes SC 225 : sushila agarwal and others vs state ( NCT of Delhi) ; An accused can move application under section 438 CRPC 1973 before FIR is filed or before filing of charge sheet if FIR is registered , court can impose conditions including limited period of anticipatory bail [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) DRTC 378 : Authorised officer state bank of india vs Allwyn Alloys pvt Ltd: No civil court can exercise jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a debt recovery tribunal or debt recovery appellate tribunal is empowered
[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) MLJ 191 : Anil kumar jinabhai Patel vs pravinchandra jinabhai Patel: Arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 (3) : The delivery of an arbitral award under section 31 (5) of the act is not a matter of mere formality, it is a matter of substance , limitation period of three months cannot be condoned beyond thirty days
[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes SC 225 : sushila agarwal and others vs state ( NCT of Delhi) ; An accused can move application under section 438 CRPC 1973 before FIR is filed or before filing of charge sheet if FIR is registered , court can impose conditions including limited period of anticipatory bail
[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) DRTC 378 : Authorised officer state bank of india vs Allwyn Alloys pvt Ltd: No civil court can exercise jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a debt recovery tribunal or debt recovery appellate tribunal is empowered
