You may also like...
-
-
28.Accordingly, the Criminal appeal stands allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants vide judgment dated 13.07.2018 in SC.NO.267/2016 by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, is set aside and the appellants are acquitted of all charges levelled against them. 29.It is reported that the appellants are on bail. Bail bonds, if any executed by them, shall stand terminated. Fine amount if any paid, shall be refunded to them. [SSSRJ] [SMJ] 22.12.2023 AP Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No To 1.The III Additional Sessions Judge Salem. 2.The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Attur. 3.The Inspector of Police Thalaivasal Police Station Salem District. 4.The Public Prosecutor High Court,Chennai. S.S.SUNDAR, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. AP Judgment in Crl.A.No.510/2018 22.12.2023. For Appellants : Mr.A.Natarajan Senior counsel for Mr.— For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Addl.Public Prosecutor JUDGMENT S.S.SUNDAR, J.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 27, 2023
-
16.As seen from the above, the Supreme Court also dealt with Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and held that mere support to a banned organization will not by itself can become an offence. 9.That apart, when the petitioner claims that he requires eight hours to complete the programme, the condition that the programme should be conducted between 10 a.m. to 13.00 p.m. is also not proper and appropriate. Similarly, when the Police is going to cover the programme for legal scrutiny, they can also video-graph the event. They cannot require the petitioner to video-graph the entire programme and submit it to the petitioner. Therefore, aforesaid conditions namely condition Nos.1, 3 and 4 are set aside. Petitioner may be given eight hours time to conduct the programme from 10.00 a.m. on 23.12.2022. The respondent can make its own arrangement for videographing the oratory competition. It is made clear that the speech shall not be against the sovereignty of the nation, should not affect the sovereignty of the friendly relations of SAARC nations. Other conditions are upheld. 10.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.01.2023 ep Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J., ep To 1.The Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai – 107. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. W.P. No.339 of 2023 10.01.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2023