SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and justice N Sathish Kumar observed that the petitioner has not pointed out any specific violation in the affidavit, barring a general allegation that political

[01/04, 08:10] sekarreporter1: ” Read ePaper News Madurai Videos India Elections 2026 World Tesseract Life & Style Entertainment Business Tech TOI Games Cricket Sports TV Web Series Education Speaking Tree Success Story Of Visionary...

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court has ruled that imposing a penalty under Section 73 of the GST Act is unjustified when the tax liability is admitted and substantially paid. In this case, the petitioner had made

[01/04, 08:01] sekarreporter1: ” Home Products What’s New Query Free Trial Login INR (₹) Print 31.03.2026: WHERE THE TAX LIABILITY IS ADMITTED AND SUBSTANTIALLY PAID, IMPOSITION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 73 OF THE GST...

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court has condoned a 247-day delay in filing a service tax appeal, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court invoked a special Goods and Services Tax (GST)

[01/04, 07:47] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-excuses-day-covid-linked-delay-restores-appeal-in-lakh-service-tax-case-1444397 [01/04, 07:47] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has condoned a 247-day delay in filing a service tax appeal, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court invoked a...

Uncategorized

Judge Arul murugan#cruelty or harassment meted out to the deceased by the accused thereafter in 6 months prior to the date of occurrence. In the absence of any such evidence, the charge for offences under Sections 498A and 304B of IPC and Section 4 of the Act are not proved.

2026:MHC:1273 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 24.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON :  30.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Crl.A.No.284 of 2022 Das @ Pragalathan, S/o.Danusu, Gangaiamman Kovil Street, Kalaiyur Village,...

Uncategorized

Justice G. Arul Murugan observed: “… Unless it is established that the deceased was subjected to cruelty in connection with the demand of dowry soon before death, the presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act cannot be raised and the offence under Section 304B IPC will not get attracted. Further

Home  / Court Updates  / High Courts  / Madras High Court Dowry Death Presumption Cannot Be Invoked Without Proof Of Cruelty Soon Before Death: Madras High Court Sets Aside Conviction The High Court held...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com