Author: Sekar Reporter

28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:33] sekarreporter1: Mr. Karti Chidambaram through his lawyer Mr. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan had filed a Writ Petition before the Madras High Court for renewal of passport for a regular validity of 10 years since the Regional Passport Authority had indicated that his passport, which was due to expire on 5th March 2024, would only be renewed for one year

28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:33] sekarreporter1: Mr. Karti Chidambaram through his lawyer Mr. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan had filed a Writ Petition before the Madras High Court for renewal of passport for a regular validity of 10 years since the Regional Passport Authority had indicated that his passport, which was due to expire on 5th March 2024, would only be renewed for one year

[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:33] sekarreporter1: Mr. Karti Chidambaram through his lawyer Mr. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan had filed a Writ Petition before the Madras High Court for renewal of passport for a regular validity...

28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: Honorable Mrs. Justice Anitha Sumanth of MadrasbHigh court directed the Regional Passport Authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Mr. Karthi P. Chidambaram after hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate appearing for the sitting MP.

28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: Honorable Mrs. Justice Anitha Sumanth of MadrasbHigh court directed the Regional Passport Authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Mr. Karthi P. Chidambaram after hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate appearing for the sitting MP.

[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: Honorable Mrs. Justice Anitha Sumanth of MadrasbHigh court directed the Regional Passport Authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Mr. Karthi P. Chidambaram...

45.For the aforesaid reasons, the request of the appellants are taken on record and the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.46.Even though we have found that the impleading petitioner has a locus standi to be represented in these Intra Court Appeals in view of the withdrawal of these Intra Court Appeals, it would be a futile exercise to order the impleading petitions, hence the Application for impleading are closed as unnecessary. However, there shall be no order as to costs.(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)28.03.2024Index: YesSpeaking Order Neutral Citation:YespbnR.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.pbnWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220 of 202328.03.2024

45.For the aforesaid reasons, the request of the appellants are taken on record and the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.46.Even though we have found that the impleading petitioner has a locus standi to be represented in these Intra Court Appeals in view of the withdrawal of these Intra Court Appeals, it would be a futile exercise to order the impleading petitions, hence the Application for impleading are closed as unnecessary. However, there shall be no order as to costs.(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)28.03.2024Index: YesSpeaking Order Neutral Citation:YespbnR.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.pbnWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220 of 202328.03.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 06.02.2024PRONOUNCED ON : 28.03.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220...

[28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.

[28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.

Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein...

Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.

Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.

Madras High Court cautions people against falling prey to property manipulators Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira says, middlemen are on the prowl cheating property owners as well as purchasers; directs DGP to prevent such crimes...

Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.

Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.

The said G.O 721 was issued by the State directingthe materials collected by the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry into the alleged irregularities in construction of new secretariat building at Omandurar to be handed over...

28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it

28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it

[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust...

உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து

உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து

திருட்டு வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்டவர் காவல் நிலையத்தில் மரணமடைய காரணமாக இருந்ததாக மதுரையில் உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. விருதுநகர் நகராட்சியில் துப்புரவு பணியாளராக பணியாற்றும்...

Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.

Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.

Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of...

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has summoned three advocates, an Inspector of Police and a property purchaser to the court on Thursday following a complaint that they broke upon the lock of a residential house and took forcible possession of the property.

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has summoned three advocates, an Inspector of Police and a property purchaser to the court on Thursday following a complaint that they broke upon the lock of a residential house and took forcible possession of the property.

“ HOMENEWSINDIATAMIL NADUMadras High Court frowns upon advocates who accompany clients to take forcible possession of immovable properties Justice N. Anand Venkatesh says such conduct demeans the entire legal profession since lawyers are expected to...