Author: Sekar Reporter

Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS  (APPELLATE SIDE)     CONT.P. No.                        of 2022  In  C.M.P.No.     of 2022  In  O.S.A.No.                  of 2022  In     O.A.No.328 of 2022  In  C.S.No.111 of 2012     M.Shanmugam,  1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam,  Ayyampalayam Road,  KNP Colony Post,  Veerapandi,  Tiruppur,  Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/  APPELLANT  Vs  All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam,  Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator  Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy,  having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai,  Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.     The General Council of the Central Organisation,  All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam  Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator,  Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy,  having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai,  Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.        The Central Executive Committee,

Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012 M.Shanmugam, 1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam, Ayyampalayam Road, KNP Colony Post, Veerapandi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Vs All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam, Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The General Council of the Central Organisation, All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator, Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The Central Executive Committee,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012  ...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN  S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007  Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  /     I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai    for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                   For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan   for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                   For R3                : No appearance     (R2-died & R4-given up)   JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai   for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                  For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan  for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                  For R3                : No appearance    (R2-died & R4-given up)  JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 02.011.2021 PRONOUNCED ON: 26.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / 1st Respondent / Plaintiff Senthamarai Venkatesh...

Thus, this Court do not find any perversity or infirmity in respect of the decision taken by the State Bank of India based on the policy decision of the Government of India, which was adopted by the Indian Bank Association. Smsj mhc.     For Petitioners   : M/s.R.Vaigai                                                                 Senior Advocate                                                                 For M/s.Anna Mathew                                   For Respondents                                For R1 and R2     :  Mr.Om Prakash                                                                 Senior Advocate                                                                 For Mr.K.Chandrasekar                                   For R4                    :  Mr.S.Rajesh                                                                 For Mr.Karthik Ranganathan                                   For R3                    : No appearance                                                                  ORDER

Thus, this Court do not find any perversity or infirmity in respect of the decision taken by the State Bank of India based on the policy decision of the Government of India, which was adopted by the Indian Bank Association. Smsj mhc. For Petitioners   : M/s.R.Vaigai                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For M/s.Anna Mathew                               For Respondents                               For R1 and R2     :  Mr.Om Prakash                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For Mr.K.Chandrasekar                               For R4                    :  Mr.S.Rajesh                                                                For Mr.Karthik Ranganathan                               For R3                    : No appearance                                                                ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  : 24.06.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.11991 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 and W.M.P.No.8869 of 2018...

Admk case appeal midnight   full order       O.S.A.No.160 of 2022 and C.MP.No. 9962 of 2022  M.DURAISWAMY, J.  and   SUNDER MOHAN, J  (Order of the Court made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.)  In view of the  urgency expressed by the  learned counsel appearing for the appellant,  the Hon’ble the Chief Justice has permitted the learned counsel for the appellant  to move the   above Original Side Appeal  for admission

Admk case appeal midnight full order O.S.A.No.160 of 2022 and C.MP.No. 9962 of 2022 M.DURAISWAMY, J. and  SUNDER MOHAN, J (Order of the Court made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.) In view of the  urgency expressed by the  learned counsel appearing for the appellant,  the Hon’ble the Chief Justice has permitted the learned counsel for the appellant  to move the   above Original Side Appeal  for admission

 O.S.A.No.160 of 2022 and C.MP.No. 9962 of 2022 M.DURAISWAMY, J. and  SUNDER MOHAN, J (Order of the Court made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.) In view of the  urgency expressed by the  learned counsel appearing for the...

Sekarreporter: A full bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr.Justice P.N.Prakash, Hon’ble Mrs.Justice R.Hemalatha and Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.A.Nakkiran, was constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice on the reference made by Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, vide an order dated 19.01.2022 in W.P.No.25247 of 2021 (batch), to answer the following questions:

Sekarreporter: A full bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr.Justice P.N.Prakash, Hon’ble Mrs.Justice R.Hemalatha and Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.A.Nakkiran, was constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice on the reference made by Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, vide an order dated 19.01.2022 in W.P.No.25247 of 2021 (batch), to answer the following questions:

[6/26, 07:37] Sekarreporter: A full bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr.Justice P.N.Prakash, Hon’ble Mrs.Justice R.Hemalatha and Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.A.Nakkiran, was constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice on the reference made by Hon’ble Mr. Justice M....

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Call Now ButtonCALL ME