SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

Uncategorized

REAKING Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt quash a Goondas detention order issued by former Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun (now serving as Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption) on September 22, 2025 for detaining realtor Santhosh

[29/05, 15:45] sekarreporter1: BREAKING Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt quash a Goondas detention order issued by former Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun (now serving as Director of Vigilance and...

Learned Counsel for Petitioner B. Jagannath stated that in these circumstances Co ordinate Division Bench judgements will not be applicable as Learned Supreme Court has stated in an identical matter involving- Shree Banke Bihari temple – that a committee has to be formed to abolish special Darshan and VIP Queue system & accordingly report has been filed by said committee before the Honourable Apex Court in this aspect last week in May. Hence the same is squarely applicable to present case.

Uncategorized

Learned Counsel for Petitioner B. Jagannath stated that in these circumstances Co ordinate Division Bench judgements will not be applicable as Learned Supreme Court has stated in an identical matter involving- Shree Banke Bihari temple – that a committee has to be formed to abolish special Darshan and VIP Queue system & accordingly report has been filed by said committee before the Honourable Apex Court in this aspect last week in May. Hence the same is squarely applicable to present case.

Learned Counsel for Petitioner B. Jagannath stated that in these circumstances Co ordinate Division Bench judgements will not be applicable as Learned Supreme Court has stated in an identical matter involving- Shree Banke Bihari...

Uncategorized

Andal Chockalingam Vs Commissioner and another – For orders – matter pertaining to abolishment of special Darshan and VViP Darshan. Matter was taken up at 130 before lunch. B. Jagannath appeared for Petitioner and Learned AAG PV Balasubramanian appeared for Respondents. Memo was filed by the Learned AAG that no agamas was violated and Thiruparankundram temple was not kept open for arrival

[29/05, 14:59] sekarreporter1: Item 42. Andal Chockalingam Vs Commissioner and another – For orders – matter pertaining to abolishment of special Darshan and VViP Darshan. Matter was taken up at 130 before lunch. B....

Uncategorized

Court asks Additional Advocate General PV Balasubramaniam if closing of Tirupparankundram Subramaniaswamy temple was delayed for darshan by a Minister [29/05, 14:26] sekarreporter1: AAG denies that temple closure timing was delayed.

[29/05, 14:36] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxy5AgHAzcWhd6M6SCFIu-sZd8DtY13l4Z?si=8VfpuDt2cri71a8T [29/05, 14:36] sekarreporter1: [29/05, 14:25] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt hears plea seeking to abolish VIP darshan, special darshan in temples. Court asks Additional Advocate General PV Balasubramaniam if closing of Tirupparankundram Subramaniaswamy...

MadrasHC Adjourns hearing of a PIL seeking a probe into using children for electoral gain by #TVKVijay‌HQ to July 1, 2026; petition also alleged bribing of voters by AIADMK and DMK candidates in certain constituencies @xpresstn

Uncategorized

MadrasHC Adjourns hearing of a PIL seeking a probe into using children for electoral gain by #TVKVijay‌HQ to July 1, 2026; petition also alleged bribing of voters by AIADMK and DMK candidates in certain constituencies @xpresstn

[29/05, 13:05] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHC Adjourns hearing of a PIL seeking a probe into using children for electoral gain by #TVKVijay‌HQ to July 1, 2026; petition also alleged bribing of voters by AIADMK and DMK...

விசாரணை முடிந்து 3 மாதங்களுக்குள் தீர்ப்பு வழங்க வேண்டும் தீர்ப்பு வழங்குவதில் காலதாமதம் ஏற்படுவது தொடர்பான வழக்கில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

Uncategorized

விசாரணை முடிந்து 3 மாதங்களுக்குள் தீர்ப்பு வழங்க வேண்டும் தீர்ப்பு வழங்குவதில் காலதாமதம் ஏற்படுவது தொடர்பான வழக்கில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

விசாரணை முடிந்து 3 மாதங்களுக்குள் தீர்ப்பு வழங்க வேண்டும் தீர்ப்பு வழங்குவதில் காலதாமதம் ஏற்படுவது தொடர்பான வழக்கில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com