Follow:
- Next story We leave it for the government to take a decision in coordination with all other stake holders. We make it clear that the government must respond,” a first bench of Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad said while disposing off the plea.
- Previous story The nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Monday said that it will consider re-framing the issues on essential religious practices, interplay between faith and fundamental rights, and extent of judicial review on religious practices which were referred in the Sabarimala review order passed by a 5-judge bench on November 14, 2019. The CJ-led bench has asked the Secretary General of the Supreme Court to convene a meeting of all lawyers involved in the case on January 17 for this purpose. The meeting will decide the points of : 1. Reframing or addition of issues. 2. Allocation of issues among lawyers. 3. Division of time between lawyers. The bench comprises CJI S A Bobde, Justice R Banumathi, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice L Nageswara Rao, Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar, Justice S Abdul Nazeer, Justice R Subhash Reddy, Justice B R Gavai and Justice Surya Kant.
Recent Posts
- இஸ்லாமியர்’ எனும் சாதி சான்றிதழ் வழங்கும் அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்த உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வின் தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து தமிழ்நாடு அரசு மேல்முறையீடு செய்யும். – சி.டி.ஆர் நிர்மல் குமார், மாண்புமிகு சட்டத்துறை அமைச்சர்.
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on
More
Recent Posts
- இஸ்லாமியர்’ எனும் சாதி சான்றிதழ் வழங்கும் அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்த உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வின் தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து தமிழ்நாடு அரசு மேல்முறையீடு செய்யும். – சி.டி.ஆர் நிர்மல் குமார், மாண்புமிகு சட்டத்துறை அமைச்சர்.
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on