SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: November 15, 2021

P.THILAKKUMAR MADRAS HIGH COURT Government Pleader MADURAI BENCH MADURAI. Date: 12.11.2021 To All Law Officers (Civil side) 0/0. The Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai — 23. Copy to The Advocate General of Tamilnadu, 0/0. The Advocate General, High Court of Madras,

Uncategorized

P.THILAKKUMAR MADRAS HIGH COURT Government Pleader MADURAI BENCH MADURAI. Date: 12.11.2021 To All Law Officers (Civil side) 0/0. The Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai — 23. Copy to The Advocate General of Tamilnadu, 0/0. The Advocate General, High Court of Madras,

P.THILAKKUMAR MADRAS HIGH COURT Government Pleader MADURAI BENCH MADURAI. Date: 12.11.2021 To All Law Officers (Civil side) 0/0. The Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai — 23. Copy to The Advocate...

Full order of MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.8385 of 2014, 30655 of 2013 & 35028 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 W.P.No.8385 of 2014: Meenakshi Venkatathri -vs- 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Periyar Salai, Payment of compensation/ex gratia by the Government is not a bar for the eligible victims to claim Insurance benefits and compensations under various other welfare legislations in the manner known to law. 24. With the above directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Sriram For R1 : Mr.V.Arun Additional Advocate General V assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.S.Silambanan

Uncategorized

Full order of MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.8385 of 2014, 30655 of 2013 & 35028 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 W.P.No.8385 of 2014: Meenakshi Venkatathri -vs- 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Periyar Salai, Payment of compensation/ex gratia by the Government is not a bar for the eligible victims to claim Insurance benefits and compensations under various other welfare legislations in the manner known to law. 24. With the above directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Sriram For R1 : Mr.V.Arun Additional Advocate General V assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.S.Silambanan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.10.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.8385 of 2014, 30655 of 2013 & 35028 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 W.P.No.8385 of...

Justice R Subramanian ruled that scope of enquiry in an application for revocation of leave is very limited, inasmuch as the Court has to take the allegations in the plaint as true and see whether the plaintiff has demonstrated that any part of the cause of action had arisen within the original jurisdiction of this Court.

Uncategorized

Justice R Subramanian ruled that scope of enquiry in an application for revocation of leave is very limited, inasmuch as the Court has to take the allegations in the plaint as true and see whether the plaintiff has demonstrated that any part of the cause of action had arisen within the original jurisdiction of this Court.

The Madras High Court has iterated that while considering an application for revocation of leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, the Court cannot consider the evidence on record or decide the...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com