SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: November 3, 2021

Full order of THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE  C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.Nos. 21801 of 2012 and 17856 of 2015 Crl.O.P.Nos. 5356 & 2691 of 2011  Crl.O.P.No. 13904 of 2015 And Crl.O.P.No. 1661 of 2016 W.P.No. 21801 of 2012: Pramod Kumar … Petitioner Vs. Cbi case

Uncategorized

Full order of THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE  C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.Nos. 21801 of 2012 and 17856 of 2015 Crl.O.P.Nos. 5356 & 2691 of 2011  Crl.O.P.No. 13904 of 2015 And Crl.O.P.No. 1661 of 2016 W.P.No. 21801 of 2012: Pramod Kumar … Petitioner Vs. Cbi case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 08.10.2021      PRONOUNCED ON:    02 .11.2021 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE  C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.Nos. 21801 of 2012 and 17856 of 2015 Crl.O.P.Nos. 5356 & 2691...

Judge c v karthikeyan order பாஸி நிதி நிறுவனத்துக்கு எதிரான மோசடி வழக்கையும், நிதிநிறுவன பெண் இயக்குனரிடம் 3 கோடி ரூபாய் லஞ்சம் பெற்றதாக அப்போதைய ஐஜி பிரமோத்குமார் உள்ளிட்ட போலீசார் மீதான வழக்கையும் சிபிஐ-க்கு மாற்றியது சரியே என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Judge c v karthikeyan order பாஸி நிதி நிறுவனத்துக்கு எதிரான மோசடி வழக்கையும், நிதிநிறுவன பெண் இயக்குனரிடம் 3 கோடி ரூபாய் லஞ்சம் பெற்றதாக அப்போதைய ஐஜி பிரமோத்குமார் உள்ளிட்ட போலீசார் மீதான வழக்கையும் சிபிஐ-க்கு மாற்றியது சரியே என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

  பாஸி நிதி நிறுவனத்துக்கு எதிரான மோசடி வழக்கையும், நிதிநிறுவன பெண் இயக்குனரிடம் 3 கோடி ரூபாய் லஞ்சம் பெற்றதாக அப்போதைய ஐஜி பிரமோத்குமார் உள்ளிட்ட போலீசார் மீதான வழக்கையும் சிபிஐ-க்கு மாற்றியது சரியே என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.judge vl முதலீடுகளுக்கு அதிக வட்டி...

Judge Dandhabani order தொழிலதிபரை கடத்தி சென்று சொத்துக்களை எழுதி வாங்கிய வழக்கில் போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு முன்ஜாமீன் வழங்க ஐகோர்ட்டு மறுப்பு

Uncategorized

Judge Dandhabani order தொழிலதிபரை கடத்தி சென்று சொத்துக்களை எழுதி வாங்கிய வழக்கில் போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு முன்ஜாமீன் வழங்க ஐகோர்ட்டு மறுப்பு

  தொழிலதிபரை கடத்தி சென்று சொத்துக்களை எழுதி வாங்கிய வழக்கில் போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு முன்ஜாமீன் வழங்க ஐகோர்ட்டு மறுப்பு சென்னை, நவ.4& தொழிலதிபரை குடும்பத்துடன் கடத்திச் சென்று சொத்துக்களை எழுதி வாங்கி வழக்கில் போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு முன்ஜாமீன் வழங்க சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டு மறுத்துள்ளது. இதையடுத்து முன்ஜாமீன் மனுவை...

Family case Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR   C.M.A.No.2988 of 2021 R.Kalaiselvi. –We have no hesitation in concurring with the findings of the learned Family Court Judge. All the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant in the Appeal relates to the factum of proving the marriage and also to prove the marriage through conduct of the parties. The counsel for the Appellant also contended that the parties are living together from the year 2013 onwards. When the marriage has not been solemnized under any one of the enactments, even assuming that there was long and continuous cohabitation or the parties were living together will not give rise to a cause of action for filing an application for restitution of conjugal rights. Long cohabitation or living together will not confer upon the parties any legal right to raise a matrimonial dispute before the Family Court, unless their marriage has been solemnized in a manner known to law. In view of the above said facts, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.                                 

Uncategorized

Family case Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR   C.M.A.No.2988 of 2021 R.Kalaiselvi. –We have no hesitation in concurring with the findings of the learned Family Court Judge. All the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant in the Appeal relates to the factum of proving the marriage and also to prove the marriage through conduct of the parties. The counsel for the Appellant also contended that the parties are living together from the year 2013 onwards. When the marriage has not been solemnized under any one of the enactments, even assuming that there was long and continuous cohabitation or the parties were living together will not give rise to a cause of action for filing an application for restitution of conjugal rights. Long cohabitation or living together will not confer upon the parties any legal right to raise a matrimonial dispute before the Family Court, unless their marriage has been solemnized in a manner known to law. In view of the above said facts, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.                                 

Sekarreporter   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON 21.10.2021 DELIVERED ON 02.11.2021   CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR   C.M.A.No.2988 of 2021...

Senior counsel A.L Somayaji was instructed by Advocate Biju Varghese Abraham in the matter on behalf of the appellant. The Kerala High Court on Tuesday issued an interim stay on the single bench decision that had directed the Enforcement Directorate to probe into the allegations that a cash deposit of Rs 10 crores was made during demonetisation into the curre

Uncategorized

Senior counsel A.L Somayaji was instructed by Advocate Biju Varghese Abraham in the matter on behalf of the appellant. The Kerala High Court on Tuesday issued an interim stay on the single bench decision that had directed the Enforcement Directorate to probe into the allegations that a cash deposit of Rs 10 crores was made during demonetisation into the curre

[11/2, 20:11] Sekarreporter1: The Kerala High Court on Tuesday issued an interim stay on the single bench decision that had directed the Enforcement Directorate to probe into the allegations that a cash deposit of...

Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Cont. P.No.1009 of 2019 in WMP Nos.14266, 14267 & 14268 of 2019 in W.P.No.14210 of 2019 P.Krishnan. Admittedly, the order passed by this Court has got merged with the order of the Supreme Court and this Court cannot entertain the Contempt Petition at this moment. It is needless to mention that since the Apex Court has not stayed the hearing of the Writ Petition, there is no impediment for hearing and passing final orders in the Writ petition on merits.                                                  

Uncategorized

Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Cont. P.No.1009 of 2019 in WMP Nos.14266, 14267 & 14268 of 2019 in W.P.No.14210 of 2019 P.Krishnan. Admittedly, the order passed by this Court has got merged with the order of the Supreme Court and this Court cannot entertain the Contempt Petition at this moment. It is needless to mention that since the Apex Court has not stayed the hearing of the Writ Petition, there is no impediment for hearing and passing final orders in the Writ petition on merits.                                                  

Sekarreporter   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED: 13.09.2021   CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN   Cont. P.No.1009 of 2019 in WMP...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com