SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Justice P B Balaji, while ordering notice to HR&CE and other respondents including the DGP, granted a week’s time for filing the counter-affidavit, and adjourned the hearing to November 24.  The petition was filed by advocate and activist ‘Elephant’ G Rajendran

Justice P B Balaji, while ordering notice to HR&CE and other respondents including the DGP, granted a week’s time for filing the counter-affidavit, and adjourned the hearing to November 24. The petition was filed by advocate and activist ‘Elephant’ G Rajendran

[18/11, 11:54] Sekarreporter: “Add TNIE As A Trusted Source CHENNAI: The Madras HC on Monday directed the HR&CE department and the DGP to file counter-affidavit to a petition seeking preparation of a crowd management...

[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking  “Need time to read the Lokpal order”.   Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI to chargesheet her in the alleged cash-for-query row.   The Lokpal order was given to the Court today in a sealed envelope.   @MahuaMoitra #Lokpal

[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking “Need time to read the Lokpal order”. Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI to chargesheet her in the alleged cash-for-query row. The Lokpal order was given to the Court today in a sealed envelope. @MahuaMoitra #Lokpal

[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking “Need time to read the Lokpal order”. Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI...

[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents  The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May 16 judgment that had prohibited the Centre from granting retrospective environmental clearances (ECs) to projects found violating environmental norms.  READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May 16 judgment that had prohibited the Centre from granting retrospective environmental clearances (ECs) to projects found violating environmental norms. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May...

Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020  G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar   dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for

Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for

[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic...

Ex-SC judge bats for larger jurisdiction for Madurai HC The Madurai Bench was established in 2004, with the intention of avoiding people travelling long distances to the Principal Seat at Chennai. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

[18/11, 10:29] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxHr2zTtDxa4Oh9IPCgOqSfJf0EySz2mV1?si=wPD992CPtTH7KEat [18/11, 10:30] Sekarreporter: [18/11, 10:28] Sekarreporter: [18/11, 10:06] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1990640209365774745?t=z6ejUvKpt3k0DyIr5vLD9Q&s=08 [18/11, 10:27] Sekarreporter: [18/11, 10:27] Sekarreporter: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2025/Nov/18/ex-sc-judge-bats-for-larger-jurisdiction-for-madurai-hc [18/11, 10:27] Sekarreporter: NATION WORLD STATES OPINIONS CITIES BUSINESS SPORT GOOD NEWS MOVIES...

As a corollary, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. 62. Consequently, (T)CMA(PT) No.58 of 2023 is allowed without any order as to costs by directing that Patent Application no.4693/CHENP/2010 shall proceed to grant on the basis of the last submitted claims. 04.11.2025 Index : Yes Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes kal  1. The Controller of Patents & Designs The Patent Office, Doudhik Sampada Bhawan, Plot No.32, Sector-14 Dwarka, New Delhi-110 078. 2. The Controller of Patents The Patent Office, Patent Office Intellectual Property Building G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.  SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. kal (T)CMA(PT) No.58 of 2023 OA/57/2020/PT/CHN 04.11.2025

2025:MHC:2579 Order Reserved on 05.08.2025 Order Pronounced on 04.11.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY (T)CMA(PT) No.58 of 2023 OA/57/2020/PT/CHN AB INITIO TECHNOLOGY LLC (Through its...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com