Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for

[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for admissibility , paper print out of what’s app message inadmissible
[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2025 (2) 305 SC : central bank of India vs Prabha Jain: SARFASI act does not provide mechanism for deciding ownership disputes or validity of sale / mortgage , cases where title disputes arise between legal heirs or third parties are beyond scope of DRT s jurisdiction
[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2025 (3) CTC 600 : P Marimuthu vs SS Prabhakar an ( DB ) ; Impleading petition can be entertained at any stage of proceeding, at any time before pronouncement of judgement ( CPC order 1 rule 10(2))
[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2025 (4) CTC 845 : IL & FS financial services ltd vs Adhunik meghalaya steels pvt ltd : With regard to debt acknowledgement , acknowledgement merely renews debt and does not create new right of action

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com