SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Therefore, eventhough I am in agreement in part with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the procedure adopted by Trial Court is incorrect, still this revision will not succeed and I find nothing in this complaint to refer the same to investigation to the respondent police.  Accordingly, this revision is dismissed. For Petitioner           : Mr.S.A.Sathia Chandran                                  For Respondents       : Mr.S.Vinothkumar   Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Therefore, eventhough I am in agreement in part with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the procedure adopted by Trial Court is incorrect, still this revision will not succeed and I find nothing in this complaint to refer the same to investigation to the respondent police.  Accordingly, this revision is dismissed. For Petitioner           : Mr.S.A.Sathia Chandran                                  For Respondents       : Mr.S.Vinothkumar   Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,     Kotturpuram Zone, Kotturpuram, Chennai....

Savuku sankar casen full.order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial). For Registry : Shri.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel      assisted by Shri.N.Mohideen Basha      Standing counsel for High Court For Respondent No.1       : Contemnor in-person For Respondent No.5       : Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri,             Assistant Solicitor General of India           for Madurai Bench ORDER. Madurai jail ,

Uncategorized

Savuku sankar casen full.order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial). For Registry : Shri.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel      assisted by Shri.N.Mohideen Basha      Standing counsel for High Court For Respondent No.1       : Contemnor in-person For Respondent No.5       : Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri,             Assistant Solicitor General of India           for Madurai Bench ORDER. Madurai jail ,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of...

stay granted tasmac shop opening HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No.   24893  of 2022   Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.                                                                                                                          …Petitioner

Uncategorized

stay granted tasmac shop opening HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No.   24893  of 2022   Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.                                                                                                                          …Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction)     W.P.No.   24893  of 2022     Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.      ...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. Nos. 9048 of 2016 and W.P. Nos. 1668 to 1670 of 2017 and Considering the importance of the issue regarding the conversion of Armed Reserve Police Personnel to Law and Order category, this Court emphatically reiterate that the procedures as contemplated and the eligibility criterias fixed including the suitability of Police Personnel are to be assessed in the interest of the Law and Order to be maintained in the society at large, which is the public interest and a constitutional mandate to be performed by the Police Departments. Since the Law and Order is having direct implication on the protection of Fundamental Rights of the citizen under Part III of the Constitution of India, the Director General of Police is directed to ensure that the women and men of high discipline, integrity and honesty are converted to Law and Order wing for the purpose of upholding the Constitutional Directives. For Petitioner             :            Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanaban                     [ in all W.Ps.]                                         For Respondents     :           Mr.B.Vijay                     [ in all W.Ps.]              Additional Government Pleader                                                                                                        COMMON  ORDER .

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. Nos. 9048 of 2016 and W.P. Nos. 1668 to 1670 of 2017 and Considering the importance of the issue regarding the conversion of Armed Reserve Police Personnel to Law and Order category, this Court emphatically reiterate that the procedures as contemplated and the eligibility criterias fixed including the suitability of Police Personnel are to be assessed in the interest of the Law and Order to be maintained in the society at large, which is the public interest and a constitutional mandate to be performed by the Police Departments. Since the Law and Order is having direct implication on the protection of Fundamental Rights of the citizen under Part III of the Constitution of India, the Director General of Police is directed to ensure that the women and men of high discipline, integrity and honesty are converted to Law and Order wing for the purpose of upholding the Constitutional Directives. For Petitioner             :            Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanaban                     [ in all W.Ps.]                                         For Respondents     :           Mr.B.Vijay                     [ in all W.Ps.]              Additional Government Pleader                                                                                                        COMMON  ORDER .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  : 06.09.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. Nos. 9048 of 2016 and W.P. Nos. 1668 to 1670 of 2017 and WMP.Nos.19074,...

Madras high court orders sep 14 eps tender actor news

Uncategorized

Madras high court orders sep 14 eps tender actor news

  [9/15, 06:31] Sekarreporter1: தலைமறைவான நடிகை மீரா மிதுன் பெங்களூருவில் தஞ்சமடைந்து இருப்பதாகவும், அவரை விரைந்து கைது செய்து நீதிமன்றத்தில் ஆஜர்படுத்துவதாகவும் காவல் துறை தரப்பில் சென்னை முதன்மை அமர்வு நீதிமன்றத்தில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டது. பட்டியலினத்தவர்கள் குறித்து சமூக வலைதளங்களில் அவதூறு கருத்துக்களை வெளியிட்டதாக, நடிகை மீரா...

Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Petitioners acquitted in a false criminal case – separate charge memo filed – After delay of 9 years. Held: Department cannot file second charge memo for the same facts and circumstances of first charge memo – Inordinate and unexplained delay of 9 years in filing charge memo – Writ petitions allowed – Court also directed the Government to issue revised guidelines for timely filing of charge memo as and if needed – revised guidelines published

Uncategorized

Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Petitioners acquitted in a false criminal case – separate charge memo filed – After delay of 9 years. Held: Department cannot file second charge memo for the same facts and circumstances of first charge memo – Inordinate and unexplained delay of 9 years in filing charge memo – Writ petitions allowed – Court also directed the Government to issue revised guidelines for timely filing of charge memo as and if needed – revised guidelines published

I [9/14, 14:41] Sekarreporter1: [9/14, 14:24] Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com