Mhc advt vinothpandian today law tips

[1/16, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 128 : state bank of india & others vs veetee fine foods : Castigating of bank officials and passing disparaging remarks need to be avoided ( sec 20 RDDBFI act 1993 )
[1/16, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 618 : geetanjali sahoo vs presiding officer DRT : regard to challenge against order of recovery officer , held writ petition not maintainable as there is a statutory remedy of appeal under sec 20 of RDDBFI act 1993 .
[1/16, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 335 SC : Ram kishun & others vs state of UP ; Authorities are duty bound to decide as to sale of part of property would meet the outstanding amounts , valuation of a property is a question of fact and valuation of property is required to be determined fairly and reasonably
[1/16, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 731 : M/ S priya bhatia vs state bank of patiala : Rights of third party.auction purchaser cannot be set at naught because of one time settlement which was on basis of consent of borrower and creditor ( sec 30 RDDBFI act 1993 )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME