You may also like...
-
Arb.Appln.Nos.280 & 281 of 2022 in O.A.Nos.740 and 741of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., These applications have been moved by the applicant, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., (in short, TACTV), seeking to direct the respondents to hand over the materials, that have been specifically mentioned in the Judge’s summons mentioned therein. The learned Addl.Advocate General j ravinthiren appearing for the applicant would submit that the respondent has interfered with the functioning of the CAS servers and also with the licence key and thus, stopping the
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 10, 2022
-
Partition of Ancestral property – Contention that suit properties were purchased from income derived from ancestral property – No substantial evidence led to prove said fact – It cannot be said that suit properties were purchased from income of joint family property – Suit rightly dismissed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 22, 2020
-
New judges madras high court photos one judge photo not get
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 4, 2021