Follow:
- Next story Today advocate general Vijayanarayanan mhaa prsident Mohanakrishnan mba president arl sundaresan met Cj in chamber mhc request Cj to take up urgent case only Cj informed them afternoon. Or evening Cj and judges will meet and take good decession
- Previous story Justice V Bhavani Subbaroyan observed that since the petitioner had admitted her guilt before the inquiry officer, the court was of the view that the disciplinary authority had rightly dismissed the petitioner from service for her misdeeds.
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
More
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
