Daily Archive: November 5, 2022

Judges R Subramaniyam and judge kumares babu விதிமீறல் கட்டிடம் மீது ஆண்டுக்கணக்கில் நடவடிக்கை எடுக்காமல் கும்பகர்ணன் போல் தூங்கி கொண்டிருந்தது ஏன்? சென்னை மாநகராட்சிக்கு உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி.   W.P.No.18272 of 2022  SUBRAMANIAN, J.  and  K.KUMARESH BABU, J.  (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.)  We had in fact required the Commissioner, Chennai Corporation to appear in Court today at 10.30 a.m, since we find that the Law Enforcing Agency viz., Chennai Corporation is not satisfactorily performing its duties and allows persons to violate the planning permission with impunity. 

Judges R Subramaniyam and judge kumares babu விதிமீறல் கட்டிடம் மீது ஆண்டுக்கணக்கில் நடவடிக்கை எடுக்காமல் கும்பகர்ணன் போல் தூங்கி கொண்டிருந்தது ஏன்? சென்னை மாநகராட்சிக்கு உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி. W.P.No.18272 of 2022 SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J. (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.) We had in fact required the Commissioner, Chennai Corporation to appear in Court today at 10.30 a.m, since we find that the Law Enforcing Agency viz., Chennai Corporation is not satisfactorily performing its duties and allows persons to violate the planning permission with impunity. 

விதிமீறல் கட்டிடம் மீது ஆண்டுக்கணக்கில் நடவடிக்கை எடுக்காமல் கும்பகர்ணன் போல் தூங்கி கொண்டிருந்தது ஏன்? சென்னை மாநகராட்சிக்கு உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி. சென்னை கோட்டூர்புரத்தில் உள்ள அடுக்குமாடி குடியிருப்பில் விதிகளை மீறி கட்டிய கட்டுமானங்களுக்கு எதிராக நடவடிக்கை எடுக்கக் கோரி விஜயபாஸ்கர் என்பவர் வழக்கு மாநகராட்சி ஆணையரை நேரில...

தமிழ்நாடு ஜிம்னாஸ்டிக்ஸ் சங்க தேர்தல் முடிவு செல்லும். உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு.

தமிழ்நாடு ஜிம்னாஸ்டிக்ஸ் சங்க தேர்தல் முடிவு செல்லும். உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு.

தமிழ்நாடு ஜிம்னாஸ்டிக்ஸ் சங்க தேர்தல் முடிவு செல்லும். உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு. சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவின் படி தமிழ்நாடு ஜிம்னாஸ்டிக்ஸ் சங்க நிர்வாகிகள் தேர்தல் நடத்தி கடந்த 02/11/2021 அன்று முடிவு அறிவிக்கப்பட்டது. இது இந்திய ஜிம்னாஸ்ட்டிக்ஸ் சம்மேளனத்தால் அங்கீகரிக்கப்பட்டு செயல்பாட்டில் இருந்து வருகிறது. அந்த...

W.P.Nos.29290 and 29306 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.28583, 28584, 28608 & 28609 of 2022 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.  Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Seethapathy learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent TNCA in W.P.No.29290 of 2022. Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 1st respondent and Mr. Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Seethapathy learned counsel takes notice for the 3rd respondent in W.P.No.29306 of 2022.  Heard Mr.M.Maharaja for Mr.S.Senthil Kumar in W.P.No.29290 of 2022 and Mr.G.Murugendiran for Mr.Jothi Kumar in W.P.No.29306 of 2022, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that, the electoral college for the election to be conducted for the respondent Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA) to elect the office bearers of the TNCA for the next three years consists of three categories.

W.P.Nos.29290 and 29306 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.28583, 28584, 28608 & 28609 of 2022 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Seethapathy learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent TNCA in W.P.No.29290 of 2022. Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 1st respondent and Mr. Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Seethapathy learned counsel takes notice for the 3rd respondent in W.P.No.29306 of 2022. Heard Mr.M.Maharaja for Mr.S.Senthil Kumar in W.P.No.29290 of 2022 and Mr.G.Murugendiran for Mr.Jothi Kumar in W.P.No.29306 of 2022, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that, the electoral college for the election to be conducted for the respondent Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA) to elect the office bearers of the TNCA for the next three years consists of three categories.

W.P.Nos.29290 and 29306 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.28583, 28584, 28608 & 28609 of 2022 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Seethapathy learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent TNCA in W.P.No.29290...

Tamil Nadu Gymnastics Association, (TNGA)     Rep. by its General Secretary,     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN  O.A.Nos.798 & 799 of 2021 andFor Applicant           : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan,               Senior Counsel    for Mr.T.Ramesh Kutty &    Mr.N.Sivaprakash                                   For R1, R4, R12, R15,    : Mr.Vijay Narayan,                                 D16 and D19    Senior Counsel     For Mr.K.Moorthy                           For R3                         : Ms.J.Madhumitha  For R2, R5, R6 to R11,                                 R13 and R18        : No appearance  COMMON ORDER

Tamil Nadu Gymnastics Association, (TNGA)    Rep. by its General Secretary, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN O.A.Nos.798 & 799 of 2021 andFor Applicant           : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan,              Senior Counsel    for Mr.T.Ramesh Kutty &    Mr.N.Sivaprakash                                  For R1, R4, R12, R15,    : Mr.Vijay Narayan,                                D16 and D19    Senior Counsel    For Mr.K.Moorthy                          For R3                         : Ms.J.Madhumitha For R2, R5, R6 to R11,                                R13 and R18        : No appearance COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 14.10.2022 Pronounced on  : 04.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN O.A.Nos.798 & 799 of 2021 and O.A.No.225 of 2022 in C.S.No.357 of...

Hon’ble Justice R. Suresh Kumar. J was the Electoral officer appointment was not in a transparent manner as well as the Election officer had bad antecedents while he was a state Election Commissioner in 2006 the same was reported in 2007 (1) CTC 705. Another ground is one of the presidential candidates is Mr. Ashok sigamani s/o. Dr. Ponmudi name was not found on the Eligible voter list. Hence, acceptance of his nomination was illegal. Yet another ground is 187 full members are there. However, the Election officer published eligible voters as only 155 members. It is illegal. After hearing the arguments of the petitioner’s side as well as the respondent’s Hon’ble Court passed an interim order to Let the election go on. Declare the result if the election is proper. However, the result will be subject to the outcome of the Pending Writ petition. on behalf of the petitioner in W. P. No. 29306/2022, Mr. G. Murugendran for M. Jothi Kumar for Respondents senior counsel P. R. Raman and V. Ramesh appeared.

Hon’ble Justice R. Suresh Kumar. J was the Electoral officer appointment was not in a transparent manner as well as the Election officer had bad antecedents while he was a state Election Commissioner in 2006 the same was reported in 2007 (1) CTC 705. Another ground is one of the presidential candidates is Mr. Ashok sigamani s/o. Dr. Ponmudi name was not found on the Eligible voter list. Hence, acceptance of his nomination was illegal. Yet another ground is 187 full members are there. However, the Election officer published eligible voters as only 155 members. It is illegal. After hearing the arguments of the petitioner’s side as well as the respondent’s Hon’ble Court passed an interim order to Let the election go on. Declare the result if the election is proper. However, the result will be subject to the outcome of the Pending Writ petition. on behalf of the petitioner in W. P. No. 29306/2022, Mr. G. Murugendran for M. Jothi Kumar for Respondents senior counsel P. R. Raman and V. Ramesh appeared.

The Secretary of saidapet Gymkhana club filed a writ petition before this Hon’ble court challenging the Election of the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association Election scheduled on 05.11.2022. Arguments put forth before the Hon’ble Justice...

Sivaji: Please publish sir, again started to write bites daily until end of our Constitution. [11/5, 07:01] Sekarreporter 1: CONSTITUTION CONTINUES. S. Mahveer Shivaji MHC Advocate Art. 13……………According to the Indian/Bharat Constitution the making of law is vested with parliament, but as we discussed earlier it’s transforming to many forms by diluting the

Sivaji: Please publish sir, again started to write bites daily until end of our Constitution. [11/5, 07:01] Sekarreporter 1: CONSTITUTION CONTINUES. S. Mahveer Shivaji MHC Advocate Art. 13……………According to the Indian/Bharat Constitution the making of law is vested with parliament, but as we discussed earlier it’s transforming to many forms by diluting the

[11/5, 01:48] Sivaji: Please publish sir, again started to write bites daily until end of our Constitution. [11/5, 07:01] Sekarreporter 1: CONSTITUTION CONTINUES. S. Mahveer Shivaji MHC Advocate Art. 13……………According to the Indian/Bharat Constitution...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com