SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: October 17, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368 to 9371 of 2020 & 4281 of 2021 Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, Madurai through its Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer         … Petitioner full For Petitioner           : Mr.S.Manohar                                  For R1 and R2          : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan   Additional Government Pleader                          For R3      : Mr.T.Joseph Jayakumar                              R4  : Died                          For R5      : Mr.R.Murali                          For R6 : Mr.S.Madhavan                                                    for Mr.Arun Srivatsava O R D E R

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368 to 9371 of 2020 & 4281 of 2021 Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, Madurai through its Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer         … Petitioner full For Petitioner           : Mr.S.Manohar                                  For R1 and R2          : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan   Additional Government Pleader                          For R3      : Mr.T.Joseph Jayakumar                              R4  : Died                          For R5      : Mr.R.Murali                          For R6 : Mr.S.Madhavan                                                    for Mr.Arun Srivatsava O R D E R

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON                     :   25.08.2022 PRONOUNCED ON :  11.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597 of 2021 and For Appellants             :Mr.R.Baskar Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R1 :Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R2 :Mr.S.Venkatesan *** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.). This Court is unable to find any justification as to why the State intends to pay additional compensation by acquiring private lands, when alternative Government poramboke lands are available, as contended by the Writ Petitioners.

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597 of 2021 and For Appellants             :Mr.R.Baskar Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R1 :Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R2 :Mr.S.Venkatesan *** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.). This Court is unable to find any justification as to why the State intends to pay additional compensation by acquiring private lands, when alternative Government poramboke lands are available, as contended by the Writ Petitioners.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON: 01.09.2022 PRONOUNCED ON: 23.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597...

https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1581871470648905728?t=L2hnwCPKJzzPAM8k6h7Iqg&s=08 [10/17, 10:26] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:24] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:20] Manohar S Madurai Adv: On GRSJ Allowed WP(MD)10641of 2020 filed by Sri Meenakshi

Uncategorized

https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1581871470648905728?t=L2hnwCPKJzzPAM8k6h7Iqg&s=08 [10/17, 10:26] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:24] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:20] Manohar S Madurai Adv: On GRSJ Allowed WP(MD)10641of 2020 filed by Sri Meenakshi

[10/17, 10:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1581871470648905728?t=L2hnwCPKJzzPAM8k6h7Iqg&s=08 [10/17, 10:26] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:24] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: 👍 [10/17, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 10:20] Manohar S Madurai Adv: On GRSJ Allowed WP(MD)10641of 2020 filed...

0/17, 10:19] Sekarreporter 1: Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LAgNGEhEaxJJ6x5xJsMAIF [10/17, 10:20] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 09:17] Sekarreporter 1: Grsj full order The respondents 2 and 3 ought not to have declined to forward the writ petitioner’s application for eventual

Uncategorized

0/17, 10:19] Sekarreporter 1: Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LAgNGEhEaxJJ6x5xJsMAIF [10/17, 10:20] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 09:17] Sekarreporter 1: Grsj full order The respondents 2 and 3 ought not to have declined to forward the writ petitioner’s application for eventual

[10/17, 10:19] Sekarreporter 1: Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LAgNGEhEaxJJ6x5xJsMAIF [10/17, 10:20] Sekarreporter 1: [10/17, 09:17] Sekarreporter 1: Grsj full order The respondents 2 and 3 ought not to have declined...

Grsj full order The respondents 2 and 3 ought not to have declined to forward the writ petitioner’s application for eventual consideration by the Central Government. No exception can be taken to the writ petitioner’s request.  The third respondent is directed to forward the petitioner’s application dated 25.04.2022 to the second respondent and the second respondent shall forward the same to the first respondent.  The first respondent shall take a call in the matter within a period of sixteen (16) weeks thereafter.  The writ petition is allowed on these terms.  No costs.      11.10.2022

Uncategorized

Grsj full order The respondents 2 and 3 ought not to have declined to forward the writ petitioner’s application for eventual consideration by the Central Government. No exception can be taken to the writ petitioner’s request.  The third respondent is directed to forward the petitioner’s application dated 25.04.2022 to the second respondent and the second respondent shall forward the same to the first respondent.  The first respondent shall take a call in the matter within a period of sixteen (16) weeks thereafter.  The writ petition is allowed on these terms.  No costs.      11.10.2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF  MADRAS HIGH COURT ORDERS  RESERVED ON        :   22.08.2022       PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON  :      11.10.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Writ Petition (MD) No.12361 of 2022 Abirami.S. ..Vs.. 1.The Union of...

Pandiyarajan Son: Wrong news by you. Since we challenged interim order court directed us to challenge the final order afresh with same grounds [10/17, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 15849-15851/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2022 in WAMD No. 973/2022, WAMD No. 977/2022 and WAMD No. 980/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras At Madurai) TAMILNADU SPINNING MILLS ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)

Uncategorized

Pandiyarajan Son: Wrong news by you. Since we challenged interim order court directed us to challenge the final order afresh with same grounds [10/17, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 15849-15851/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2022 in WAMD No. 973/2022, WAMD No. 977/2022 and WAMD No. 980/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras At Madurai) TAMILNADU SPINNING MILLS ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)

[10/16, 13:55] Pandiyarajan Son: 👆🏻Wrong news by you. Since we challenged interim order court directed us to challenge the final order afresh with same grounds [10/17, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3...

The conviction of the accused appellant under Section 302 of the IPC is set aside. He is acquitted of the charge framed against him. He shall be set at liberty forthwith if not required to be detained in connection with any other offences. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (SNEHA DAS)                              (RANJANA SHAILEY)

Uncategorized

The conviction of the accused appellant under Section 302 of the IPC is set aside. He is acquitted of the charge framed against him. He shall be set at liberty forthwith if not required to be detained in connection with any other offences. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (SNEHA DAS)                              (RANJANA SHAILEY)

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 64­65 OF 2022 Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti           …Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh      …Respondent U D G M E N T...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com