SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: October 7, 2022

In view of the above, this criminal appeal is allowed by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant in SC.No.80 of 2016 dated 12.10.2018 by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal and the appellant is aquitted of all the charges. Fine amount, if any, paid by the appellant shall be refunded to him and bail bond ,if any, executed by the appellant shall stand cancelled. (S.V.N.J.,)         (A.D.J.C.J.,)   07.10.2022     For Appellant    : Mr.S.Shanmugavelayutham, Sr.Counsel                   for Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.Babu Muthumeeran, APP.            

Uncategorized

In view of the above, this criminal appeal is allowed by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant in SC.No.80 of 2016 dated 12.10.2018 by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal and the appellant is aquitted of all the charges. Fine amount, if any, paid by the appellant shall be refunded to him and bail bond ,if any, executed by the appellant shall stand cancelled. (S.V.N.J.,)         (A.D.J.C.J.,)   07.10.2022     For Appellant    : Mr.S.Shanmugavelayutham, Sr.Counsel                   for Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.Babu Muthumeeran, APP.            

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 10..08.2022 Pronounced on :      07..10.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.646 of 2018 Raman...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.25370 of 2022 G.Vijaya Kumar                          ..              Petitioner.    For Petitioner                           :         Mr.J.Umaid Gothi                                  For Respondents                            :       Mr.K.Sathish Kumar Standing Counsel In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed with the cost of Rs.5.000/-, which the petitioner shall pay to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, High Court Campus, Chennai within a period of thirty days and report compliance. For such compliance, post the matter after six weeks. 22.09.2022        

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.25370 of 2022 G.Vijaya Kumar                          ..              Petitioner.    For Petitioner                           :         Mr.J.Umaid Gothi                                  For Respondents                            :       Mr.K.Sathish Kumar Standing Counsel In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed with the cost of Rs.5.000/-, which the petitioner shall pay to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, High Court Campus, Chennai within a period of thirty days and report compliance. For such compliance, post the matter after six weeks. 22.09.2022        

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.25370 of 2022 G.Vijaya Kumar                          ..              Petitioner Vs. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation...

THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022 C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Director, In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section 5(1) also” Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar C O M M O N O R D E R

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022 C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Director, In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section 5(1) also” Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar C O M M O N O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 Reserved on 15.06.2022 C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 Reserved on 24.06.2022 Pronounced on  29.09.2022   CORAM:   THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA   C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937...

Uncategorized

Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017

  Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and...

Mhc orders oct 6

Uncategorized

Mhc orders oct 6

[10/6, 12:27] Sekarreporter1: மும்பை வங்கிக் கணக்கில் டிபாசிட் செய்யப்பட்டிருந்த 40 கோடி ரூபாயை விடுதலைப்புலிகள் அமைப்புக்காக, மோசடி செய்து எடுக்க முயன்றதாக பதிவு செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்டவர்களுக்கு சட்டப்பூர்வ ஜாமீன் வழங்க மறுத்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. இந்தியன் ஓவர்சீஸ் வங்கியின் மும்பை...

worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar      For Petitioner         :  Mr.C.Selvaraj                   For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader                          For R3   : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R  

Uncategorized

worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar      For Petitioner         :  Mr.C.Selvaraj                   For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader                          For R3   : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar                               … Petitioner Vs 1.The Joint Commissioner,   ...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com