SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: July 3, 2021

: 03 JULY 2021 18:35 IST ‘It will be throttling the spirit of democracy if it was not allowed to examine the impact of NEET’ The State government has questioned the maintainability of a case filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) State secretary K. Nagarajan in the Madras High Court against the constitution of Justice A.K. Rajan Committee to study the impact of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) on medical college admissions in the State. In a counter affidavit, filed through Advocate-General R. Shunmugasundaram, the government said the petitioner had failed to plead as to how any of

Uncategorized

: 03 JULY 2021 18:35 IST ‘It will be throttling the spirit of democracy if it was not allowed to examine the impact of NEET’ The State government has questioned the maintainability of a case filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) State secretary K. Nagarajan in the Madras High Court against the constitution of Justice A.K. Rajan Committee to study the impact of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) on medical college admissions in the State. In a counter affidavit, filed through Advocate-General R. Shunmugasundaram, the government said the petitioner had failed to plead as to how any of

NEWS STATES TAMIL NADU TAMIL NADU Govt. questions maintainability of case against Justice A.K. Rajan Committee Legal Correspondent CHENNAI 03 JULY 2021 18:30 IST UPDATED: 03 JULY 2021 18:35 IST ‘It will be throttling...

The Madras High Court on Friday accused Lyca Productions in T Nagar, the makers of Indian-2, starring actor-turned-politician Kamal Hassan, of indulging in `forum shopping’ seeking remedy from multiple courts. . For Applicant : Mr. R. Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Counsel for M/s.D.Saikumaran -+—-+CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Original.Application Nos.211 and 212 of 2021 and Application No.2043 of 2021 in O.A.No.211 of 2021 M/s. Lyca Productions Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Director Mr.Neelakant Narayanpur No.55, Vijayaraghava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600017. … Applicant [in all Applications] versus Mr.S. Shankar S/o Mr.Shanmugam No.5/115, Ashok Street, Bharathi Avenue, Injambakam Chennai 600 115. … Respondent [in all Applications]

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court on Friday accused Lyca Productions in T Nagar, the makers of Indian-2, starring actor-turned-politician Kamal Hassan, of indulging in `forum shopping’ seeking remedy from multiple courts. . For Applicant : Mr. R. Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Counsel for M/s.D.Saikumaran -+—-+CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Original.Application Nos.211 and 212 of 2021 and Application No.2043 of 2021 in O.A.No.211 of 2021 M/s. Lyca Productions Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Director Mr.Neelakant Narayanpur No.55, Vijayaraghava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600017. … Applicant [in all Applications] versus Mr.S. Shankar S/o Mr.Shanmugam No.5/115, Ashok Street, Bharathi Avenue, Injambakam Chennai 600 115. … Respondent [in all Applications]

[7/3, 18:38] Sekarreporter: The Madras High Court on Friday accused Lyca Productions in T Nagar, the makers of Indian-2, starring actor-turned-politician Kamal Hassan, of indulging in `forum shopping’ seeking remedy from multiple courts. ....

The jewellers say it is unreasonable to restrict making of gold jewels to 14,18 and 22 karat only The Madras High Court has directed the Centre to respond by July 27 to a writ petition filed by the Chennai Jewellers Association (CJA) challenging the Hallmarking of Gold Jewellery and Gold Artefacts Order, 2020. Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitted Central government panel counsel V.T. Balaji to take notices on behalf of the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).

Uncategorized

The jewellers say it is unreasonable to restrict making of gold jewels to 14,18 and 22 karat only The Madras High Court has directed the Centre to respond by July 27 to a writ petition filed by the Chennai Jewellers Association (CJA) challenging the Hallmarking of Gold Jewellery and Gold Artefacts Order, 2020. Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitted Central government panel counsel V.T. Balaji to take notices on behalf of the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).

NEWS CITIES CHENNAI CHENNAI Chennai jewellers move High Court challenging Hallmarking of Gold Jewellery Order, 2020 Photograph used for representational purposes only Photograph used for representational purposes only | Photo Credit: PICHUMANI K Mohamed...

The Madras High Court on Friday rejected a plea by Lyca Productions to restrain film director S. Shankar from making any other movie without completing the Kamal Haasan-starrer Indian 2. Justice N. Sathish Kumar also refused to direct Mr. Shankar to furnish security for ₹170.23 crore, the amount Lyca Productions had reportedly spent so far on making Indian 2, if he wanted to direct two movies in parallel. The judge agreed with senior counsel P.S. Raman, and advocate saikumaran representing the director, that Lyca Productions had not made out a prima facie case to grant an injunction restraining him from working on other movies till Indian 2 is completed. However, the firm could file a civil suit for damages against the director if it could prove that he was the reason for the delay in completing Indian 2, he added.

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court on Friday rejected a plea by Lyca Productions to restrain film director S. Shankar from making any other movie without completing the Kamal Haasan-starrer Indian 2. Justice N. Sathish Kumar also refused to direct Mr. Shankar to furnish security for ₹170.23 crore, the amount Lyca Productions had reportedly spent so far on making Indian 2, if he wanted to direct two movies in parallel. The judge agreed with senior counsel P.S. Raman, and advocate saikumaran representing the director, that Lyca Productions had not made out a prima facie case to grant an injunction restraining him from working on other movies till Indian 2 is completed. However, the firm could file a civil suit for damages against the director if it could prove that he was the reason for the delay in completing Indian 2, he added.

15 NEWS CITIES CHENNAI CHENNAI HC refuses to restrain Shankar from directing other movies without completing Indian 2 Legal Correspondent CHENNAI 03 JULY 2021 01:14 IST UPDATED: 03 JULY 2021 01:14 IST The Madras...

the judges said that the Delhi and Andhra Pradesh governments appeared to be bearing a major quantum of the premium to be paid by lawyers for a group insurance scheme. They said a similar exercise could be undertaken in Tamil Nadu too. Justice Kirubakaran said there was a model where out of the annual premium of ₹5,000 per lawyer, the State government contributed ₹4,000 and individual lawyers were asked to pay ₹1,000. He asked the Advocate General to use his good offices and persuade the government to implement it. The senior judge also told the Advocate General that many lawyers had died due to COVID-19 and their families were in dire need of money. He said the government could also consider helping those families.

Uncategorized

the judges said that the Delhi and Andhra Pradesh governments appeared to be bearing a major quantum of the premium to be paid by lawyers for a group insurance scheme. They said a similar exercise could be undertaken in Tamil Nadu too. Justice Kirubakaran said there was a model where out of the annual premium of ₹5,000 per lawyer, the State government contributed ₹4,000 and individual lawyers were asked to pay ₹1,000. He asked the Advocate General to use his good offices and persuade the government to implement it. The senior judge also told the Advocate General that many lawyers had died due to COVID-19 and their families were in dire need of money. He said the government could also consider helping those families.

NEWS STATES TAMIL NADU TAMIL NADU HC wants T.N. govt. to provide insurance cover to 65,000 lawyers Legal Correspondent CHENNAI 03 JULY 2021 00:48 IST UPDATED: 03 JULY 2021 00:48 IST Ad Petitioner says...

Advt Purusothaman: Yesterday this matter Honble Supreme Court passed orders upholding the order of the Honble High Court of Madras. Honble High Court had awarded 27 Lakhs as compensation to the dependents of the deceased who at the time of his death was 41 years.

Uncategorized

Advt Purusothaman: Yesterday this matter Honble Supreme Court passed orders upholding the order of the Honble High Court of Madras. Honble High Court had awarded 27 Lakhs as compensation to the dependents of the deceased who at the time of his death was 41 years.

[7/3, 11:48] Advt Purusothaman: Yesterday this matter Honble Supreme Court passed orders upholding the order of the Honble High Court of Madras. Honble High Court had awarded 27 Lakhs as compensation to the dependents...

Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.15791 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD) No.13237 of 2020 T.Beril Lynora # 12.In view of the above, the very registration of the marriage by the second respondent is invalid in the eye of law. The second respondent failed in his duty by not scrutinizing the documents and ascertaining the age of the petitioner and the registration has taken place in a mechanical fashion. Unfortunately, the registration of the marriage by the second respondent is now standing in the way of the petitioner and it will very seriously affect her future prospects. The learned counsel for the third respondent has categorically submitted that the third respondent leaves it to the decision of the Court and the third respondent will abide by any decision. 13.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the very registration is bad in the eye of law, this Court is inclined to interfere with the registration of the marriage by the second respondent. Accordingly, the certificate of the registration of marriage issued by the second respondent dated 16.08.2017 in Marriage Sl.No.241/2017, is hereby quashed as illegal and opposed to law. 14.In view of quashing of the Marriage Certificate issued by the second respondent, the impugned rejection order passed by the first respondent dated 21.09.2020 is also hereby set aside. As a consequence, this Court holds that there was no marriage between the petitioner and the third respondent.

Uncategorized

Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.15791 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD) No.13237 of 2020 T.Beril Lynora # 12.In view of the above, the very registration of the marriage by the second respondent is invalid in the eye of law. The second respondent failed in his duty by not scrutinizing the documents and ascertaining the age of the petitioner and the registration has taken place in a mechanical fashion. Unfortunately, the registration of the marriage by the second respondent is now standing in the way of the petitioner and it will very seriously affect her future prospects. The learned counsel for the third respondent has categorically submitted that the third respondent leaves it to the decision of the Court and the third respondent will abide by any decision. 13.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the very registration is bad in the eye of law, this Court is inclined to interfere with the registration of the marriage by the second respondent. Accordingly, the certificate of the registration of marriage issued by the second respondent dated 16.08.2017 in Marriage Sl.No.241/2017, is hereby quashed as illegal and opposed to law. 14.In view of quashing of the Marriage Certificate issued by the second respondent, the impugned rejection order passed by the first respondent dated 21.09.2020 is also hereby set aside. As a consequence, this Court holds that there was no marriage between the petitioner and the third respondent.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.15791 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD) No.13237 of 2020 T.Beril Lynora …Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Administration),...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com