SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: January 30, 2021

Uncategorized

In a rare instance, the Supreme Court Collegium has withdrawn its recommendation to confirm the permanent status of a Bombay High Court judge who had passed two controversial orders on sexual assaults

Supreme Court Holds Judge’s Confirmation Over Sex Assault Orders: Sources : https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/supreme-court-holds-judges-confirmation-over-sex-assault-order-sources-2360304 In a rare instance, the Supreme Court Collegium has withdrawn its recommendation to confirm the permanent status of a Bombay High Court...

Ap Rajagopal Mhc: *Registration of a sale agreement, expressing willingness to sell a property to a particular person on receiving full payment in future, will not be a bar for the property owner to go ahead and sell or transfer the property to a third party without getting the sale agreement annulled through a civil court decree, the Madras High Court has ruled.* [1/30, 12:41] Sekarreporter1: [1/30, 12:43] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.674 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Delivered on 12~10~2020 05 ~11~2020 CORAM The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and The Hon’ble Mr. Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR Writ Petition No.674 of 2020

Uncategorized

Ap Rajagopal Mhc: *Registration of a sale agreement, expressing willingness to sell a property to a particular person on receiving full payment in future, will not be a bar for the property owner to go ahead and sell or transfer the property to a third party without getting the sale agreement annulled through a civil court decree, the Madras High Court has ruled.* [1/30, 12:41] Sekarreporter1: [1/30, 12:43] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.674 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Delivered on 12~10~2020 05 ~11~2020 CORAM The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and The Hon’ble Mr. Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR Writ Petition No.674 of 2020

[1/30, 12:41] Sekarreporter1: [1/30, 11:43] Ap Rajagopal Mhc: *Registration of a sale agreement, expressing willingness to sell a property to a particular person on receiving full payment in future, will not be a bar...

Vaidyanathan Advt: “Hon’ble Madras High court has dismissed PIL on Lake encroachments which was filed during tenure of Hon ble Sanjay Kaul then CJ. if the policy changes like this who do we approach to make the government act on illegalities. And what is other legal remedy for such issues”? [1/30, 10:58] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.2291 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.01.2021 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.2291 of 2017 S.Vaidyanathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector Kanchipuram District Tamilnadu. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram, Chennai – 45.

Uncategorized

Vaidyanathan Advt: “Hon’ble Madras High court has dismissed PIL on Lake encroachments which was filed during tenure of Hon ble Sanjay Kaul then CJ. if the policy changes like this who do we approach to make the government act on illegalities. And what is other legal remedy for such issues”? [1/30, 10:58] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.2291 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.01.2021 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.2291 of 2017 S.Vaidyanathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector Kanchipuram District Tamilnadu. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram, Chennai – 45.

[1/30, 08:44] Vaidyanathan Advt: “Hon’ble Madras High court has dismissed PIL on Lake encroachments which was filed during tenure of Hon ble Sanjay Kaul then CJ. if the policy changes like this who do...

Sekarreporter law —[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) MLJ 191 : Anil kumar jinabhai Patel vs pravinchandra jinabhai Patel: Arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 (3) : The delivery of an arbitral award under section 31 (5) of the act is not a matter of mere formality, it is a matter of substance , limitation period of three months cannot be condoned beyond thirty days [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes SC 225 : sushila agarwal and others vs state ( NCT of Delhi) ; An accused can move application under section 438 CRPC 1973 before FIR is filed or before filing of charge sheet if FIR is registered , court can impose conditions including limited period of anticipatory bail [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) DRTC 378 : Authorised officer state bank of india vs Allwyn Alloys pvt Ltd: No civil court can exercise jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a debt recovery tribunal or debt recovery appellate tribunal is empowered

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter law —[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) MLJ 191 : Anil kumar jinabhai Patel vs pravinchandra jinabhai Patel: Arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 (3) : The delivery of an arbitral award under section 31 (5) of the act is not a matter of mere formality, it is a matter of substance , limitation period of three months cannot be condoned beyond thirty days [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes SC 225 : sushila agarwal and others vs state ( NCT of Delhi) ; An accused can move application under section 438 CRPC 1973 before FIR is filed or before filing of charge sheet if FIR is registered , court can impose conditions including limited period of anticipatory bail [1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) DRTC 378 : Authorised officer state bank of india vs Allwyn Alloys pvt Ltd: No civil court can exercise jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a debt recovery tribunal or debt recovery appellate tribunal is empowered

[1/30, 10:11] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) MLJ 191 : Anil kumar jinabhai Patel vs pravinchandra jinabhai Patel: Arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 (3) : The delivery of an arbitral award under section 31...

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter law —–30.01.2021: K. Selvaraj MHC Adv – High Court can also take evidence in a Writ Proceedings for determining disputed questions of fact where fundamental rights are involved. 1) Special Investigation Circle, Income Tax Officer Vs. Seth Bros. [AIR 1970 SC 292; (1969) 2 SCC 324] 2) Kouchunni K.K. Vs. State of Madras [AIR 1959 SC 725]

Sekarreporter law .30-01.2021:  K. Selvaraj MHC Adv – High Court can also take evidence in a Writ Proceedings for determining disputed questions of fact where fundamental rights are involved. 1) Special Investigation Circle, Income...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com