Follow:
- Next story Karur court inaguration live
- Previous story In a rare instance, the Supreme Court Collegium has withdrawn its recommendation to confirm the permanent status of a Bombay High Court judge who had passed two controversial orders on sexual assaults
Recent Posts
- [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cTlNBaZ4h88?si=28iOWQQBeYpxNmTX [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Monday appreciated the approach adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu in using preventive detention laws against cybercrime offenders. Justice Sandeep Mehta, while a plea challenging a preventive detention order against a cyber fraud accused, observed – “ This is a good trend coming from the state that preventive detention laws are being used against cyber law offenders. It’s a very welcome approach. Normal criminal laws are not proving successful against these offenders.”
- [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ofnO4w00D6g?si=-dsA-DGP5OYUhCg1 [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers The apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government in January on the case filed by a Delhi woman
- [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Kadh7tvIJ1U?si=bNytR-vhAmtKld3b [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court pulls up authorities for remaining mute spectators to illegal constructions Due to such inaction, greedy men are emboldened to construct buildings unauthorisedly, converting fertile lands into a concrete jungle, the Court lamented.
- [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/8w8Ir1PhjU0?si=buTvmEFzIubsmEYx [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court orders criminal, disciplinary, and contempt proceedings against lawyer for abusing, threatening judges Justice P.T. Asha orders criminal action as the lawyer had prevented the police from executing an NBW; directs Bar Council to initiate disciplinary action for his conduct in court
- Justice Anand Venkatesh was referring to T. Wilson v. District Collector, Kanyakumari Dist and Ors. (2021) where a coordinate bench had held that a religious right cannot be claimed to be absolute and prayer meetings
More
Recent Posts
- [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cTlNBaZ4h88?si=28iOWQQBeYpxNmTX [24/06, 08:09] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Monday appreciated the approach adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu in using preventive detention laws against cybercrime offenders. Justice Sandeep Mehta, while a plea challenging a preventive detention order against a cyber fraud accused, observed – “ This is a good trend coming from the state that preventive detention laws are being used against cyber law offenders. It’s a very welcome approach. Normal criminal laws are not proving successful against these offenders.”
- [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ofnO4w00D6g?si=-dsA-DGP5OYUhCg1 [24/06, 08:05] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers The apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government in January on the case filed by a Delhi woman
- [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Kadh7tvIJ1U?si=bNytR-vhAmtKld3b [24/06, 07:31] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court pulls up authorities for remaining mute spectators to illegal constructions Due to such inaction, greedy men are emboldened to construct buildings unauthorisedly, converting fertile lands into a concrete jungle, the Court lamented.
- [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/8w8Ir1PhjU0?si=buTvmEFzIubsmEYx [24/06, 07:51] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court orders criminal, disciplinary, and contempt proceedings against lawyer for abusing, threatening judges Justice P.T. Asha orders criminal action as the lawyer had prevented the police from executing an NBW; directs Bar Council to initiate disciplinary action for his conduct in court
- Justice Anand Venkatesh was referring to T. Wilson v. District Collector, Kanyakumari Dist and Ors. (2021) where a coordinate bench had held that a religious right cannot be claimed to be absolute and prayer meetings
