Follow:
- Next story Case against Minister Dr PTR PALANIVEL THIAGARAJAN judge pt asha j adj for ptr minister advt Ragavachery argued for petner adv Ramasiva sanker
- Previous story Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside the Madras High Court’s order passed in May 2025 which stayed the operation of the 10 amendments passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly to remove the Governor as the Chancellor of certain State Universities. The Court asked why a vacation bench of the Court acted in a “tearing hurry” to stay the laws.
Recent Posts
- https://youtu.be/m_gnlQJsWkg?si=cva6YHuhzcNJSRrN [02/05, 16:11] sekarreporter1: IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI Present :Thiru.S.Karthikeyan, M.A., M.L., M.Sc., PGDCFSc., PGDDF., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday, the 30th day of April, 2026. Crl.M.P.Nos.3737, 3759, 3776, 3915/2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.4071, 4069 and 4068/2026 (Intervene Petitions) in Cyber Crime Wing (CCW) Crime No.47/2026 Srinath @ Sriram .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3737/2026 / Accused 1. Sanjay 2. Bala @ Balakrishnan 3. Manigandan 4. Ruthran .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3759/2026 / Accused Rajesh .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3776/2026 / Accused 1. Prasanth 2. Selvam 3. Rajini .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3915/2026 / Accused Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, CCD-I, CCW-SCCIC Chennai. ..Respondent/Complainant. This petition is coming on this day before this court for hearing in the presence of M/s.G.Prabhakaran, K.Ram Sankar, S.Jayaprakash,
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.
More
Recent Posts
- https://youtu.be/m_gnlQJsWkg?si=cva6YHuhzcNJSRrN [02/05, 16:11] sekarreporter1: IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI Present :Thiru.S.Karthikeyan, M.A., M.L., M.Sc., PGDCFSc., PGDDF., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday, the 30th day of April, 2026. Crl.M.P.Nos.3737, 3759, 3776, 3915/2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.4071, 4069 and 4068/2026 (Intervene Petitions) in Cyber Crime Wing (CCW) Crime No.47/2026 Srinath @ Sriram .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3737/2026 / Accused 1. Sanjay 2. Bala @ Balakrishnan 3. Manigandan 4. Ruthran .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3759/2026 / Accused Rajesh .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3776/2026 / Accused 1. Prasanth 2. Selvam 3. Rajini .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3915/2026 / Accused Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, CCD-I, CCW-SCCIC Chennai. ..Respondent/Complainant. This petition is coming on this day before this court for hearing in the presence of M/s.G.Prabhakaran, K.Ram Sankar, S.Jayaprakash,
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.