![THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.No.28150 of 2014 M/s.Prashanthi Fertility Research Centre Pvt Ltd. Represented by its Director, Dr. G.Gopalaswamy. For Petitioner : Mr. V. Lakshminarayanan For Respondents : Mrs. R. Anitha Spl.Government Pleader [for R1 & R2] Mrs.K. Mageswari [for R-3]](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story 1/3, 10:07] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1345590038663364608?s=08 [1/3, 10:08] Sekarreporter1: [1/3, 10:01] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* inviting you to *FREE WORKSHOP* for *Judicial Aspirants/ Student/Advocates* Subject : *The Indian Contract Act 1872
- Previous story city civil court has severely censured a petitioner, warning him that he would be sent to Institute of Mental Health at Kilpauk for treatment if he is found loitering in court complexes, disturbing staff and court functions and making unwarranted allegations against judicial officers, while dismissing his petition.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A.(MD).Nos.696 and 697 of 2024 and C.R.P(MD).Nos.2029 and 3231 of 2023 & 2086 of 2024 C.M.A.(MD).No.696 of 2024 S.Naveen … Appellant Vs. M.Nitharshani …Respondent
- ஒரு வாக்கு வித்தியாசத்தில் வெற்றி பெற்ற, திருப்பத்தூர் தொகுதி தவெக எம்எல்ஏ சீனிவாச சேதுபதி வெற்றியை எதிர்த்து, திமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் பெரிய கருப்பன், சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தேர்தல் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளார்.
- Madras High Court seeks Centre’s response to plea against retrospective amendments to Income Tax Act 1961
- Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar of #MadrasHighCourt adjourn to next month a writ petition filed by film director S. Shankar in 2025 to quash provisional attachment of three of his properties worth ₹10.11 crore by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a case related to a copyright row over Rajinikanth starrer Enthiran. The court had on March 11, 2025 stayed the operation of the provisional attachment order passed on February 17, 2025. Today, the judges were told that a connected matter is pending before the Supreme Court. @THChennai Backgrounder👇
- https://youtu.be/Br7p1a12Xso?si=IukWgMYM9AdRz6tw [15/06, 12:35] sekarreporter1: [15/06, 12:00] sekarreporter1: A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, on Monday, dismissed Original Side Appeal Nos. 62 and 63 of 2026, which had been preferred against the order passed by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitting
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A.(MD).Nos.696 and 697 of 2024 and C.R.P(MD).Nos.2029 and 3231 of 2023 & 2086 of 2024 C.M.A.(MD).No.696 of 2024 S.Naveen … Appellant Vs. M.Nitharshani …Respondent
- ஒரு வாக்கு வித்தியாசத்தில் வெற்றி பெற்ற, திருப்பத்தூர் தொகுதி தவெக எம்எல்ஏ சீனிவாச சேதுபதி வெற்றியை எதிர்த்து, திமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் பெரிய கருப்பன், சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தேர்தல் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளார்.
- Madras High Court seeks Centre’s response to plea against retrospective amendments to Income Tax Act 1961
- Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar of #MadrasHighCourt adjourn to next month a writ petition filed by film director S. Shankar in 2025 to quash provisional attachment of three of his properties worth ₹10.11 crore by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a case related to a copyright row over Rajinikanth starrer Enthiran. The court had on March 11, 2025 stayed the operation of the provisional attachment order passed on February 17, 2025. Today, the judges were told that a connected matter is pending before the Supreme Court. @THChennai Backgrounder👇
- https://youtu.be/Br7p1a12Xso?si=IukWgMYM9AdRz6tw [15/06, 12:35] sekarreporter1: [15/06, 12:00] sekarreporter1: A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, on Monday, dismissed Original Side Appeal Nos. 62 and 63 of 2026, which had been preferred against the order passed by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitting