Follow:
- Next story Police Orderly order HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP Crl. No. 472 of 2025 A.Radhakrishnan, S/o. T.Arumuga Gounder, 38, Mettur Agraharam, Salem – 636001.
- Previous story [08/01, 18:10] Advt Ramasivasanker: WP 49241 of 2025 was filed by Advocate Shoukath Ali Mohammed as the petitioner challenging the constitution of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board under the Government Order dated 28/11/2025. The Main grounds are that the nominees of the Bar Council were not appointed and that two non-muslims were not appointed amongst others. The Case was listed as item number 40 before the Honourable First Bench on 08/01/2025 i.e. Wednesday. Mr S. Ravi Senior Counsel appeared for M/s M. Purushothaman and J. Bindu Madhavan, counsel for petitioner. Mr PS Raman Advocate General appeared for the State of Tamil Nadu. Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Counsel appeared for the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. Mr VT Balaji, Senior Panel Counsel for the Central Government appeared for the central government. After hearing the arguments at length, the Honorable First Bench stayed the Government Order re-constituting the TN Waqf Board as per New Amended Waqf Act for not constituting the TN Waqf Board in accordance with Section 14 of New Waqf Act and has injunted the TN Waqf Board from functioning further. It is needless to say that all the actions taken by the TN Waqf Board are void as the constitution of the board is ultra vires of New Amended Waqf Act [08/01, 18:10] Sekarreporter: ok’
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU O.A.No.605 of 2026 A.V.Anoop, Proprietor, AVA Productions, Rep.by his Power of Attorney Anil Kumar S No.1583, J-Block, 15th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. ..Applicant Vs 1. Sandeep Chandrasenan Nair, Proprietor, M/s.Urvasi Theatres, Now at 66/398, Santhi Building, Mahakavi Bharathiyar Road, Shenoys, Kochi, Kerala – 682 035. 2. Alex E Kurian 3. UFO Moviez India Ltd Corporate Headquarters, Valuable Techno Park, Plot No.53/1, Road No.7, MIDC, Andheri East, Mumbai – 400 093, Maharashtra
- “தடையில்லை” “FIR பதிவுவை மட்டுமே காரணம் காட்டி பாஸ்போர்ட் வழங்க மறுக்க முடியாது. புதிய பாஸ்போர்ட்டை 4 வாரங்களில் வழங்க வேண்டும்” – மெட்ராஸ் உயர்நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வு #highcourt #madurai #passport #thanthitv
- [26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: “comprising Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, while dismissing a criminal appeal filed against the conviction of an accused for offences punishable under Sections 449, 380 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, observed: “The defence further attempted to suggest that the murder might have been committed by some other person owing to an alleged partition dispute within the family” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/chandrasekar-v-the-state-2026mhc2291-alternative-theory-reasonable-doubt-1616666#:~:text=comprising%20Justice%20N,within%20the%20family [26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: .
- மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா கொலை வழக்கில் குற்றவாளிகள் சரணடைய கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்க முடியாது: உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் அதிரடி உத்தரவு
- Senior advcate wilson interview Live in chennai press club
More
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU O.A.No.605 of 2026 A.V.Anoop, Proprietor, AVA Productions, Rep.by his Power of Attorney Anil Kumar S No.1583, J-Block, 15th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. ..Applicant Vs 1. Sandeep Chandrasenan Nair, Proprietor, M/s.Urvasi Theatres, Now at 66/398, Santhi Building, Mahakavi Bharathiyar Road, Shenoys, Kochi, Kerala – 682 035. 2. Alex E Kurian 3. UFO Moviez India Ltd Corporate Headquarters, Valuable Techno Park, Plot No.53/1, Road No.7, MIDC, Andheri East, Mumbai – 400 093, Maharashtra
- “தடையில்லை” “FIR பதிவுவை மட்டுமே காரணம் காட்டி பாஸ்போர்ட் வழங்க மறுக்க முடியாது. புதிய பாஸ்போர்ட்டை 4 வாரங்களில் வழங்க வேண்டும்” – மெட்ராஸ் உயர்நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வு #highcourt #madurai #passport #thanthitv
- [26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: “comprising Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, while dismissing a criminal appeal filed against the conviction of an accused for offences punishable under Sections 449, 380 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, observed: “The defence further attempted to suggest that the murder might have been committed by some other person owing to an alleged partition dispute within the family” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/chandrasekar-v-the-state-2026mhc2291-alternative-theory-reasonable-doubt-1616666#:~:text=comprising%20Justice%20N,within%20the%20family [26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: .
- மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா கொலை வழக்கில் குற்றவாளிகள் சரணடைய கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்க முடியாது: உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் அதிரடி உத்தரவு
- Senior advcate wilson interview Live in chennai press club