Follow:
- Next story அமலாக்கத்துறை விசாரணைக்கு தடை கோரி அமைச்சர் ஐபெரியசாமி. தாக்கல் செய்த வழக கில் தலைமை நீதிபதி தடை விதிக க மறுத்தார் அமலாக்கத்துறை பதில் அளிக்க உத்தரவு for ed advt siddarth argued for i periya samy senior advt john sathya argued
- Previous story அமலாக்கத்துறைக்கு எதிராக அமைச்சராகப் பெரியசாமி வழக்கு ஐட்டம் 17 தலைமை நீதிபதி அமர்வு
Recent Posts
- When the Law Forgets the Street The Supreme Court, religious conversion and the unresolved question of caste Authored by E. Vijay Anand, Advocate, Madras High Court
- Today, the Hon’ble High Court of Madras considered a crucial legal issue relating to Section 175 (3) of BNSS,2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shamim Ahmed heard an issue pertaining to the interpretation of Section 175 (3) of BNSS,2023 in light of the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Om Prakash Ambadkar -Vs- State of Maharashtra”. The matter pertains to a direction issued by JM-III, Tiruppur to register a FIR in a matter relating to a business
- A. GANAPATHEESWARAN, ADVOCATE, MADRAS HIGH COURT **சித்தர்காடு நவீன அரிசி ஆலை மூடல் கோரி போராட்டம்: சுடுகாட்டில் போராட அனுமதி வழங்கி உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு**
- H Raja Case Stay MHC Order BJP – Advts Ramoorthy And Myladuthurai Rajendren Argued – Filed – Cross Verified With MHC Setting Aside Conviction – Justice V Lakshminarayanan – 6 Months Imprisonment For Periyar And Kanimozhi Derogatory Social Media Posts 2018 – Trial Court Dec 2 2024 Conviction Set Aside Sep 1 2026 – FIR Delay March April 2018 Complaints FIR Sep 2018 – Electronic Evidence 65B Failure*
- Allowed /8Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.Raveekumar W. P.Nos.21889, 21892 and 21894 of 2022and W.M.P.Nos.20911, 20914 & 20908 of 2022 M/s.Coramandal Leather Rep. By its Proprietor Thameem Sheriff. …Petitioner in all W.Ps. Vs. The State Tax Officer, Group-I Inspection -1/Intelligence -I No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. . Respondent in all W.Ps.
More
Recent Posts
- When the Law Forgets the Street The Supreme Court, religious conversion and the unresolved question of caste Authored by E. Vijay Anand, Advocate, Madras High Court
- Today, the Hon’ble High Court of Madras considered a crucial legal issue relating to Section 175 (3) of BNSS,2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shamim Ahmed heard an issue pertaining to the interpretation of Section 175 (3) of BNSS,2023 in light of the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Om Prakash Ambadkar -Vs- State of Maharashtra”. The matter pertains to a direction issued by JM-III, Tiruppur to register a FIR in a matter relating to a business
- A. GANAPATHEESWARAN, ADVOCATE, MADRAS HIGH COURT **சித்தர்காடு நவீன அரிசி ஆலை மூடல் கோரி போராட்டம்: சுடுகாட்டில் போராட அனுமதி வழங்கி உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு**
- H Raja Case Stay MHC Order BJP – Advts Ramoorthy And Myladuthurai Rajendren Argued – Filed – Cross Verified With MHC Setting Aside Conviction – Justice V Lakshminarayanan – 6 Months Imprisonment For Periyar And Kanimozhi Derogatory Social Media Posts 2018 – Trial Court Dec 2 2024 Conviction Set Aside Sep 1 2026 – FIR Delay March April 2018 Complaints FIR Sep 2018 – Electronic Evidence 65B Failure*
- Allowed /8Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.Raveekumar W. P.Nos.21889, 21892 and 21894 of 2022and W.M.P.Nos.20911, 20914 & 20908 of 2022 M/s.Coramandal Leather Rep. By its Proprietor Thameem Sheriff. …Petitioner in all W.Ps. Vs. The State Tax Officer, Group-I Inspection -1/Intelligence -I No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. . Respondent in all W.Ps.