![[11/19, 11:12] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1329299049644654592?s=08 [11/19, 11:13] Sekarreporter 1: Justice T. Ravindran of Madras HC refers to a Division Bench a petition filed by Bar Council of TN & Puducherry seeking a direction to TN police to register a FIR against former Madras HC judge CS Karnan for vulgar remarks against SC/HC judges & their spouses @THChennai](http://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.7435 and 7437 of 2020Before parting with, I wish to emphasize that, there are advantages in hearing cases through Whatsapp Video Call, and the fact remains that, it is less time-consuming, and it will be helpful to analyze the exact scenario of each case, so as to arrive at a definite conclusion, as was done in the case on hand. The system of viewing disputed sites through “Whatsapp Video Call or any other Application through Video mode” can be implemented in cases pertaining to encroachments on roads, water bodies, poramboke lands, Tanks, illegal constructions, OSR, Parks, etc. to ensure that, the Officials/Authorities discharge their work without any extraneous consideration. 27. With the above direction and observations, Writ Petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions if any, are closed
- Previous story Musings At Law-XVIII Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan
Recent Posts
- இஸ்லாமியர்’ எனும் சாதி சான்றிதழ் வழங்கும் அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்த உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வின் தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து தமிழ்நாடு அரசு மேல்முறையீடு செய்யும். – சி.டி.ஆர் நிர்மல் குமார், மாண்புமிகு சட்டத்துறை அமைச்சர்.
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on
More
Recent Posts
- இஸ்லாமியர்’ எனும் சாதி சான்றிதழ் வழங்கும் அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்த உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வின் தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து தமிழ்நாடு அரசு மேல்முறையீடு செய்யும். – சி.டி.ஆர் நிர்மல் குமார், மாண்புமிகு சட்டத்துறை அமைச்சர்.
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on