Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP no 11868 of 2024 dated 6th Feb 2026 Tharammel peethambaran vs T ushakrishnan : A notarised photocopy of a power of attorney cannot be treated as valid evidence unless

[12/02, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP no 11868 of 2024 dated 6th Feb 2026 Tharammel peethambaran vs T ushakrishnan : A notarised photocopy of a power of attorney cannot be treated as valid evidence unless foundational facts are established and proper procedure is followed for its admission as secondary evidence
[12/02, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( c) no 5220 of 2024 dated 28th January 2026 Anamika Jain vs Dr Atul Jain : A wife is entitled to permanent alimony that ensures she maintains a standard of living consistent with what she was accustomed to during the marriage irrespective of her educational qualifications or earning capacity
[12/02, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court ; SLP 28934 of 2025 dated 4thfeb 2026 mohtashem billah malik vs sana aftab : with regard to custody of minor children , welfare of the children is the paramount consideration but other factors like conduct of the parties financial capacity standard of living and comfort and education of the children are also relevant while determining custody
[12/02, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( criminal ) diary no 4297 of 2026 dated 3rd Feb 2026 prantik kumar vs State of jharkhand : Grant of regular bail or anticipatory bail should not be subject to deposit of any amounts

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com