Vinothpandian law tips today

[12/19, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed ahmed vs karnataka bank ltd : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily.contain reasons
[12/19, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 246 : Nakulan vs deputy gen manager canara bank : Borrower availing personal loan and gold loan , bank entitled to retain as security gold ornaments pledged till personal loan is cleared
[12/19, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 27 SC : mathew varghese vs Amritha kumari : section.13 (8) of the SARFASI.act engrafted in SARFASI act primarily with a view to protect right of a borrower
[12/19, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 58: standard chartered bank vs vishal global ltd : Both secs 17 & 17 A of SARFASI act afford an opportunity to the borrower to approach DRT or concerned district court against measure taken under section 13 ( 4) of the SARFASI.act

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME