Follow:
- Next story For Two Newly Appointed High Court CJ’s, Its A Long And Winding Road To Take Oath – https://www.indialegallive.com/top-news-of-the-day/top-story/for-two-newly-appointed-high-court-cjs-its-a-long-and-winding-road-to-take-oath-97457
- Previous story Supreme Court upholds Orissa High Court order on promotion of STs/SCs https://www.orissapost.com/supreme-court-upholds-orissa-high-court-order-on-promotion-of-sts-scs/
Recent Posts
- டெல்லி உயர்நீதிமன்றம்:-* *இரட்டை இலை விவகாரத்தில் தேர்தல் ஆணையத்திற்கு எதிராக டெல்லி உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் புகழேந்தி தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில் இந்திய தலைமை தேர்தல்
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : WP no 529 of 2025 dated 19th December 2025 X – petitioner vs union of India : supreme court entertained a writ petition under article 32 of the constitution of india due to serious
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs a host of Internet Service Providers to block websites which exhibit Sunny Deol starrer #Border2 without authorisation. Passes the orders in a case filed by
- The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld a Family Court’s decision whereby custody of a 7-year old child (respondent 2) from his biological mother (respondent 1) was refused to be transferred to the appellant—father on the grounds that he kept a second
- Madras hc news
More
Recent Posts
- டெல்லி உயர்நீதிமன்றம்:-* *இரட்டை இலை விவகாரத்தில் தேர்தல் ஆணையத்திற்கு எதிராக டெல்லி உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் புகழேந்தி தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில் இந்திய தலைமை தேர்தல்
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : WP no 529 of 2025 dated 19th December 2025 X – petitioner vs union of India : supreme court entertained a writ petition under article 32 of the constitution of india due to serious
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs a host of Internet Service Providers to block websites which exhibit Sunny Deol starrer #Border2 without authorisation. Passes the orders in a case filed by
- The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld a Family Court’s decision whereby custody of a 7-year old child (respondent 2) from his biological mother (respondent 1) was refused to be transferred to the appellant—father on the grounds that he kept a second
- Madras hc news