SEKAR REPORTER Blog

AIADMK leadership row | Supreme Court restores Palaniswami as party’s single leader A Bench, led by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict on Thursday in a batch of cross petitions concerning amendments made to the party bylaw  The Supreme Court on February 23 affirmed a Madras High Court decision which set aside an earlier August 17 order in favour of O. Panneerselvam in the tussle between him and Edappadi K. Palaniswami over the leadership of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).     A Bench, led by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict in a batch of cross petitions concerning amendments made to the party bylaws during the July 11, 2022, general council meeting. The judgment was reserved on January 11, 2023, after extensive

AIADMK leadership row | Supreme Court restores Palaniswami as party’s single leader A Bench, led by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict on Thursday in a batch of cross petitions concerning amendments made to the party bylaw The Supreme Court on February 23 affirmed a Madras High Court decision which set aside an earlier August 17 order in favour of O. Panneerselvam in the tussle between him and Edappadi K. Palaniswami over the leadership of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK). A Bench, led by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict in a batch of cross petitions concerning amendments made to the party bylaws during the July 11, 2022, general council meeting. The judgment was reserved on January 11, 2023, after extensive

AIADMK leadership row | Supreme Court restores Palaniswami as party’s single leader A Bench, led by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict on Thursday in a batch of cross petitions concerning amendments made to...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[2/23, 10:43] Thirumaran Admk Legal Wing Joint Secretry: All the resolutions taken on 11/7/2022 is not approved by the court and they did not give any findings on that and further held that the Supreme Court do not say anything on merits of those resolutions and the observations in the judgement shall not have any bearing on the trial before the civil court [2/23, 10:49] sekarreporter1: 💐

[2/23, 10:43] Thirumaran Admk Legal Wing Joint Secretry: All the resolutions taken on 11/7/2022 is not approved by the court and they did not give any findings on that and further held that the Supreme Court do not say anything on merits of those resolutions and the observations in the judgement shall not have any bearing on the trial before the civil court [2/23, 10:49] sekarreporter1: 💐

[2/23, 10:43] Thirumaran Admk Legal Wing Joint Secretry: All the resolutions taken on 11/7/2022 is not approved by the court and they did not give any findings on that and further held that the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு செல்லும் – உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு @EPSTamilNadu @ADMKofficial [2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: .

[2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு செல்லும் – உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு @EPSTamilNadu @ADMKofficial [2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: .

[2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு செல்லும் – உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு @EPSTamilNadu @ADMKofficial [2/23, 10:37] sekarreporter1: .

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Super judgement by CVKJ. Neet student order.  :  Mr. M.Ravi                   For RR 1 & 2  	  ::  Mr. Bala Manimaran      Central Government Standing Counsel                                   For 3rd Respondent   :  No appearance     For 4th Respondent:  Mr. Ramaswamy Meyyappan     Government Advocate     Puducherry  For 5th Respondent:  Mr. T.P.Manoharan    Senior Counsel    for Mr.T.M.Naveen

Super judgement by CVKJ. Neet student order. :  Mr. M.Ravi              For RR 1 & 2 ::  Mr. Bala Manimaran     Central Government Standing Counsel                                  For 3rd Respondent   :  No appearance For 4th Respondent:  Mr. Ramaswamy Meyyappan    Government Advocate    Puducherry For 5th Respondent:  Mr. T.P.Manoharan    Senior Counsel    for Mr.T.M.Naveen

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on :  06.02.2022   Pronounced on :   22.02.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN No. 32182 of 2022 And W.M.P.No. 31607 of 2022 Saminathan       …...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU & PUDUCHERRY ENROLLMENT – 22.02.2023 Ego is the real enemy in this profession.  If you are patient and give up your ego, you will, not only, shine in this profession, but you will set an example, as this will give you not only peace of mind, but also a happy and contended life.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU & PUDUCHERRY ENROLLMENT – 22.02.2023   Dear Friends on the dias and off the dias and the New Entrants to this profession, Goodevening to all....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
petitioner has a tiled roof house and naturally falling of coconuts would break the tiles and thereby causing more damages resulting in loss, I would direct the 4th respondent, Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kuthalam Taluk, to take immediate steps to cut the coconut tree lying in the premises of the 5th respondent and, also advice the petitioner to plant a guava tree. It would also provide shade and hopefully it will grow without causing obstruction. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. A direction is issued to the  4th respondent/Tahsildar, Kuthalam Taluk to act as directed above

petitioner has a tiled roof house and naturally falling of coconuts would break the tiles and thereby causing more damages resulting in loss, I would direct the 4th respondent, Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kuthalam Taluk, to take immediate steps to cut the coconut tree lying in the premises of the 5th respondent and, also advice the petitioner to plant a guava tree. It would also provide shade and hopefully it will grow without causing obstruction. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. A direction is issued to the 4th respondent/Tahsildar, Kuthalam Taluk to act as directed above

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.02.2023 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. V. KARTHIKEYAN Writ Petition No.16780 of 2022 C.Vinothkumar Versus 1.   Deputy Superintendent of Police,Mayiladuthurai. 2.   The District...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Young woman from Madhya Pradesh moves Madras High Court seeking police protection The 23-year-old said she had escaped from her home and travelled to Tamil Nadu because her stepmother and other relatives, believers of black magic, had planned to kill her as part of a human sacrifice ritual February 22, 2023 04:49 pm | Updated 05:27 pm IST – CHENNAI  THE HINDU BUREAU COMMENTSSHAREREAD LATER A view of the Madras High Court. File A view of the Madras High Court. File | Photo Credit: PICHUMANI K  A 23-year-old woman from Madhya Pradesh has filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the Director General of Police (Tamil Nadu) and the Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police to provide protection to her. She claimed to have escaped to Tamil Nadu because her stepmother was planning to use her in a human sacrifice.  In an affidavit filed through her counsel, S. Doraisamy and V. Elangovan, the petitioner said she was born in Uttar Pradesh and later migrated to Madhya Pradesh along with her family. Her father

Young woman from Madhya Pradesh moves Madras High Court seeking police protection The 23-year-old said she had escaped from her home and travelled to Tamil Nadu because her stepmother and other relatives, believers of black magic, had planned to kill her as part of a human sacrifice ritual February 22, 2023 04:49 pm | Updated 05:27 pm IST – CHENNAI THE HINDU BUREAU COMMENTSSHAREREAD LATER A view of the Madras High Court. File A view of the Madras High Court. File | Photo Credit: PICHUMANI K A 23-year-old woman from Madhya Pradesh has filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the Director General of Police (Tamil Nadu) and the Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police to provide protection to her. She claimed to have escaped to Tamil Nadu because her stepmother was planning to use her in a human sacrifice. In an affidavit filed through her counsel, S. Doraisamy and V. Elangovan, the petitioner said she was born in Uttar Pradesh and later migrated to Madhya Pradesh along with her family. Her father

Young woman from Madhya Pradesh moves Madras High Court seeking police protection The 23-year-old said she had escaped from her home and travelled to Tamil Nadu because her stepmother and other relatives, believers of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version