Daily Archive: May 3, 2026

Madras HC | Madurai Bench | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* *Case*: _Kathiravan v. Commissioner of State Tax_ | W.P.(MD)No.2286 of 2026 | 16.02.2026

[03/05, 07:52] sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-sets-aside-gst-demand-holds-personal-hearing-mandatory-before-passing-assessment-order-us-74-1443498 [03/05, 07:52] Meta AI: *Madras HC | Madurai Bench | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* *Case*: _Kathiravan v. Commissioner of State Tax_ | W.P.(MD)No.2286 of 2026 | 16.02.2026 — *1. What Happened*...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Duty of courts* When a prosecution is based on _“misunderstanding amplified into accusation”_ rather than a real offence, the High Court _must_ intervene under Sec 482 CrPC. Judicial intervention isn’t just allowed – it’s *mandatory* to prevent abuse of process.

Duty of courts* When a prosecution is based on _“misunderstanding amplified into accusation”_ rather than a real offence, the High Court _must_ intervene under Sec 482 CrPC. Judicial intervention isn’t just allowed – it’s *mandatory* to prevent abuse of process.

*Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Madras HC – Madurai Bench* *30.04.2026 | Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 16736 of 2024 | _S. Rajadurai Lingam*_ — *Full context of the quote* > _”prosecution upon exaggerated or misconceived allegations,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version