SEKAR REPORTER Blog

27.In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 10.07.2024 in I.A.No.03 of 2023 in O.S.No.2422 of 2021 on the file of the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 22.08.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No ata  To The XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.  P.B.BALAJI. J, ata Pre-delivery order made in CRP.No.1957 of 2025 & CMP.No.11192 of 2025 22.08.2025

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order reserved on : 01.08.2025 Order pronounced on : 22.08.2025 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP.No.1957 of 2025 & CMP.No.11192 of 2025 1.R.Sundararajan 2.Sundar Ganesh 3.Meenakshi...

தமிழக அரசு திருப்பரங்குன்றம் உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்த தவறியதால் தனி நீதிபதி திரு ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் அவர்கள் CISF உதவியுடன் உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்த உத்தரவிட்டது செல்லும் தமிழக அரசு தொடர்ந்து மேல்முறையீட்டு நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி- மதுரை உயர்நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு தீர்ப்பு!!!

[04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: BREAKING Justices G Jayachandran & KK Ramakrishnan of #MadrasHighCourt Madurai Bench uphold Justice GR Swaminathan’s order regarding lighting of Karthigai Deepam lamp on a Deepathoon atop the Tirupparakundram hill in Madurai. Dismiss State appeal [04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: Division Bench says there was nothing wrong on the part of the single judge in having directed CISF to accompany the petitioner for lighting the lamp on the Deepathoon. It also says Govt officials had filed the present appeal only to escape punishment in contempt proceedings.

[04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: BREAKING Justices G Jayachandran & KK Ramakrishnan of #MadrasHighCourt Madurai Bench uphold Justice GR Swaminathan’s order regarding lighting of Karthigai Deepam lamp on a Deepathoon atop the Tirupparakundram hill in Madurai. Dismiss State appeal [04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: Division Bench says there was nothing wrong on the part of the single judge in having directed CISF to accompany the petitioner for lighting the lamp on the Deepathoon. It also says Govt officials had filed the present appeal only to escape punishment in contempt proceedings.

[04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: BREAKING Justices G Jayachandran & KK Ramakrishnan of #MadrasHighCourt Madurai Bench uphold Justice GR Swaminathan’s order regarding lighting of Karthigai Deepam lamp on a Deepathoon atop the Tirupparakundram hill in Madurai....

The Madras High Court has made some significant remarks regarding communal harmony, stating that it can be achieved when communities coexist and are allowed to practice their religious acts without restriction. The court was hearing an appeal against a single judge’s order permitting devotees to light lamps at the stone pillar atop Thiruparankundram Hills near a dargah. ¹  Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan emphasized that preventing one community from performing their religious functions is not the way to achieve communal harmony. They questioned why there should be any difficulty in allowing devotees to light lamps once a year if it doesn’t affect anyone.  This case highlights the ongoing debate about religious practices and communal harmony in India. The court’s remarks suggest that coexistence and mutual respect are key to resolving such disputes.  Would you like more information on this case or the Thiruparankundram Hills dispute?

The Madras High Court has made some significant remarks regarding communal harmony, stating that it can be achieved when communities coexist and are allowed to practice their religious acts without restriction. The court was hearing an appeal against a single judge’s order permitting devotees to light lamps at the stone pillar atop Thiruparankundram Hills near a dargah. ¹ Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan emphasized that preventing one community from performing their religious functions is not the way to achieve communal harmony. They questioned why there should be any difficulty in allowing devotees to light lamps once a year if it doesn’t affect anyone. This case highlights the ongoing debate about religious practices and communal harmony in India. The court’s remarks suggest that coexistence and mutual respect are key to resolving such disputes. Would you like more information on this case or the Thiruparankundram Hills dispute?

The Madras High Court has made some significant remarks regarding communal harmony, stating that it can be achieved when communities coexist and are allowed to practice their religious acts without restriction. The court was...

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 64223/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-07-2025 in WPCRL No.255/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras] A.SHANKAR @ SAVUKKU SHANKAR                        Petitioner                                 VERSUS THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT & ORS.                 Respondents

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 64223/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-07-2025 in WPCRL No.255/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras] A.SHANKAR @ SAVUKKU SHANKAR Petitioner VERSUS THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT & ORS. Respondents

ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s)....

The Madras High Court has ruled that YouTubers cannot harm a company’s reputation or business prospects under the guise of reviewing products. Justice N. Senthilkumar granted interim relief to Nannir Water Sources LLP, a water purifier company, restraining a YouTuber from making defamatory videos about their

The Madras High Court has ruled that YouTubers cannot harm a company’s reputation or business prospects under the guise of reviewing products. Justice N. Senthilkumar granted interim relief to Nannir Water Sources LLP, a water purifier company, restraining a YouTuber from making defamatory videos about their

[04/12, 14:48] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that YouTubers cannot harm a company’s reputation or business prospects under the guise of reviewing products. Justice N. Senthilkumar granted interim relief to Nannir...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com