SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

– *Case No.:* Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12300 of 2025 – *Judge:* B.PUGALENDHI, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioner: Saravanan . C – Respondent: 1. State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Inspector of Police – *Date of Order:* Not Available – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not Available – For Respondent: Not Available – *Court Observation:* The court quashed the proceedings in Spl SC No.306 of 2023, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Theni, as against the petitioners, noting that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. ¹

[05/12, 08:10] Meta AI: The case you’re referring to, Crl.OP(MD)No.12300 of 2025, was quashed by HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI. The petitioner, Saravanan . C, had filed the case against the State of Tamil Nadu, represented...

Uncategorized

Quashed HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.OP(MD)No.12300 of 2025 and Crl.MP(MD)Nos.9539, 9542 of 2025 Saravanan . C : Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police,

2025:MHC:2570 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 28.08.2025 DELIVERED ON : 12.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.OP(MD)No.12300 of 2025 and Crl.MP(MD)Nos.9539, 9542 of 2025 Saravanan . C :...

Uncategorized

Case No.:* (link unavailable) 10688 of 2020 – *Judge:* KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioner: M/s. Khazana Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Mr. Kishore Kumar Jain – Respondent: 1. Income Tax Settlement Commission, 2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – *Date of Order:* 28.11.2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr.P.Sivaraman – For Respondent: Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel, and Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, Junior Standing Counsel – *Court Observation:* The court held that the “full and true disclosure” required under Section 245C(1) means the assessee must disclose all income in a complete and truthful manner when filing the settlement application. If any part of the disclosure is found to be untrue, the Settlement Commission can reject the entire application. The commission can’t accept part of the disclosure and reject the rest; it’s all or nothing.

[05/12, 07:44] Meta AI: The court concluded that the “full and true disclosure” required under Section 245C(1) means the assessee must disclose all income in a complete and truthful manner when filing the settlement...

Uncategorized

Wp dismissed HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.10688 of 2020 & W.M.P.Noss.12983 & 12986 of 202 0 M/s.Khazana Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Mr.Kishore Kumar Jain, 252A, NASA Building, TTK Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. (Now at No.48, Khazana Square, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014.) … Petitioner Vs. 1. Income Tax Settlement Commission

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 29.08.2025 Pronounced on 28.11.2025 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.10688 of 2020 & W.M.P.Noss.12983 & 12986 of 202 0 M/s.Khazana Jewellery Pvt....

Uncategorized

*Supreme Court of India* – *Case No.:* Civil Appeal No. 7846 of 2023 (with Civil Appeal No. 7847 of 2023) – *Judge:* Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan – *Parties:* – Appellant: The State of Karnataka & Anr. – Respondent: Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish & Anr. – *Date of Order:* December 4, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Appellant: [Not Available] – For Respondent: [Not Available] – *Court Observation:* The court held that renting residential premises as hostels to students and professionals is exempt from Goods and Services Tax (GST), emphasizing that the ultimate use of the property as a residence remains unchanged. The exemption under Entry 13 of the GST Exemption Notification No. 9/2017 applies, as the property is used for residential purposes, and imposing GST would burden students and working professionals. ¹ ² ³

*Supreme Court of India* – *Case No.:* Civil Appeal No. 7846 of 2023 (with Civil Appeal No. 7847 of 2023) – *Judge:* Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan – *Parties:* – Appellant: The...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com