Meta AI: The Madras High Court has rejected a plea to allow a village panel to conduct Jallikattu in Avaniyapuram, Madurai district. The court emphasized that Jallikattu should be conducted by the government, not private individuals, citing concerns over law and order and potential

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has rejected a plea to allow a village panel to conduct Jallikattu in Avaniyapuram, Madurai district. The court emphasized that Jallikattu should be conducted by the government, not private individuals, citing concerns over law and order and potential

[14/01, 09:31] Sekarreporter: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/plea-to-allow-village-panel-to-conduct-jallikattu-rejected/articleshow/126512102.cms [14/01, 09:31] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has rejected a plea to allow a village panel to conduct Jallikattu in Avaniyapuram, Madurai district. The court emphasized that Jallikattu should...

[14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751.html [14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:24] ayesha Bar And Bench: https://www-hindustantimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751-amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row PICK OF THE DAW Reply [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row By Ayesha Arvind Updated on: Jan 14, 2026 05:41 am IST Justice GR Swaminathan joined the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1994 and worked as a full-time pracharak for two and a half years. [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:24] ayesha Bar And Bench: https://www-hindustantimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751-amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row By Ayesha Arvind Updated on: Jan 14, 2026 05:41 am IST Justice GR Swaminathan joined the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1994 and worked as a full-time pracharak for two and a half years. [14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751.html

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

[14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751.html [14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:24] ayesha Bar And Bench: https://www-hindustantimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751-amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row PICK OF THE DAW Reply [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row By Ayesha Arvind Updated on: Jan 14, 2026 05:41 am IST Justice GR Swaminathan joined the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1994 and worked as a full-time pracharak for two and a half years. [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:24] ayesha Bar And Bench: https://www-hindustantimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751-amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row By Ayesha Arvind Updated on: Jan 14, 2026 05:41 am IST Justice GR Swaminathan joined the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1994 and worked as a full-time pracharak for two and a half years. [14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751.html

[14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751.html [14/01, 09:25] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:24] ayesha Bar And Bench: https://www-hindustantimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/justice-swaminathan-a-lamp-lighting-order-and-a-fiery-row-101768330934751-amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter: Justice Swaminathan, a lamp-lighting order and a fiery row PICK OF THE DAW Reply [14/01, 09:24] Sekarreporter:...

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

In the Stray Dogs case, one of the intervenors today argued before the Supreme Court that stray dogs protect orphan childrens as their “last line of defence on streets”, and hence, they must not be taken away. Instead of constructing shelters for dogs, authorities should endeavour to provide shelter to orphans, the lawyer suggested.

In the Stray Dogs case, one of the intervenors today argued before the Supreme Court that stray dogs protect orphan childrens as their “last line of defence on streets”, and hence, they must not...

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting aside an assessment order. The court held that notifications issued without proper GST Council recommendations are invalid, emphasizing that the power to extend time limits must be exercised strictly and only in cases of force majeure.

[14/01, 09:11] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:11] Sekarreporter: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting...

https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting aside an assessment order. The court held that notifications issued

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting aside an assessment order. The court held that notifications issued

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

Meta AI: The petitioner argued that the government order violates the HR&CE Act, which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties. They’re seeking to quash the order and have the cottages returned to temple trustees or fit persons.

[14/01, 09:08] Sekarreporter: “Stating that the GO is in violation of the HR&CE Act which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties, he requested the court to quash the order and retransfer the cottages to...

Uncategorized

January 14, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2026

Justice G R Swaminathan passed the order on a petition filed by S Vijaynarayanan, manager of a religious mutt in Chennai, who argued that the transfer would commercialize temple properties and deprive pilgrims of affordable lodging. The petitioner had stayed at ‘Hotel Alayam’ in Tiruchendur’s Subramaniya Swamy temple, unaware it was a Yatri Nivas meant for pilgrims. The court noted the government’s move could erode the temple’s charitable identity and politicize its administration. ¹ ²

[14/01, 09:03] Sekarreporter: “Justice G R Swaminathan passed the order on a petition filed by S Vijaynarayanan, manager of a religious mutt in Chennai, who sought to quash the April 26, 2024 GO issued...

SEKAR REPORTER

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has rejected a plea to allow a village panel to conduct Jallikattu in Avaniyapuram, Madurai district. The court emphasized that Jallikattu should be conducted by the government, not private individuals, citing concerns over law and order and potential

Meta AI: The petitioner argued that the government order violates the HR&CE Act, which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties. They’re seeking to quash the order and have the cottages returned to temple trustees or fit persons.

Recent Posts

Recent Posts