SEKAR REPORTER Blog

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது

மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில் இருந்த மயில் சிலையின் அலகில் மலர் தான் இருந்தது என்பதற்கான ஆதாரங்களை தாக்கல் செய்ய அறநிலையத் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. சென்னை மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலில் 2004ம் ஆண்டில் குடமுழுக்கு விழா நடைபெற்ற போது புன்னைவனநாதர் சன்னதியில்...

THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003.  Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L.,  Sessions Judge,   Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai. Dated,  Monday, the 4th day of  April, 2022. Spp arthi basker

THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge,  Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai. Dated,  Monday, the 4th day of  April, 2022. Spp arthi basker

J.F.No. 61 – Page  Judicial Form No. 61 (Cr.R.P 106) IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE,  MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge,  Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai....

9.The Registry in all the Courts must ensure that the mandatory procedures under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 have been complied with strictly in all respects, including the mentioning of name description, place of residence and all other necessary details.   C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020  S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.  This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner

9.The Registry in all the Courts must ensure that the mandatory procedures under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 have been complied with strictly in all respects, including the mentioning of name description, place of residence and all other necessary details. C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner

C.M.P(MD)No.1048 of 2022 in S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner to bring on record the proposed appellants No.3 and 4 as the legal heirs of...

[4/5, 12:24] Srimathi Advt Mhc: A good jdgmt by MGR J [4/5, 12:30] Sekarreporter: 🙏🏽 [4/5, 12:31] Srimathi Advt Mhc: Very beautifully penned starting on a philosophical note ” You will never be a better you…..” *Justice M.Govindarajan. special* mention shd lao be made of the AAG *J.Ravindran* making a fair representation appearing against his own officers

[4/5, 12:24] Srimathi Advt Mhc: A good jdgmt by MGR J [4/5, 12:30] Sekarreporter: 🙏🏽 [4/5, 12:31] Srimathi Advt Mhc: Very beautifully penned starting on a philosophical note ” You will never be a better you…..” *Justice M.Govindarajan. special* mention shd lao be made of the AAG *J.Ravindran* making a fair representation appearing against his own officers

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.02.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.32337 OF 2012 Mr. S. Ramasamy -Vs- 1.  The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by...

In view of the legal position, it is clear that the impugned order of the respondent in directing the petitioner to produce patta for the purpose of registering the sale deed is not sustainable in law.  In view of the same, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order of the respondent is set aside. The respondent is directed to receive the sale deed and register the same in accordance with law.madras high court

In view of the legal position, it is clear that the impugned order of the respondent in directing the petitioner to produce patta for the purpose of registering the sale deed is not sustainable in law. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order of the respondent is set aside. The respondent is directed to receive the sale deed and register the same in accordance with law.madras high court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.5696 of 2015 D.Jesupalam S/o.Devedasan .. Petitioner vs. The Sub Registrar, Neelangarai Sub-Registrar’s Office, Chennai – 41.                              ...

Madras High Court Judgement declaring Section 32 (2) a of the Benami Transaction Act which provides eligibility for members of Indian Legal Service/ Indian Revenue Service to be appointed as Judicial Member of Tribunal as Unconstitutional 🙏🏽

Madras High Court Judgement declaring Section 32 (2) a of the Benami Transaction Act which provides eligibility for members of Indian Legal Service/ Indian Revenue Service to be appointed as Judicial Member of Tribunal as Unconstitutional 🙏🏽

I Madras High Court Judgement declaring Section 32 (2) a of the Benami Transaction Act which provides eligibility for members of Indian Legal Service/ Indian Revenue Service to be appointed as Judicial Member of...

Madras high court april 4 th orders

Madras high court april 4 th orders

[4/4, 11:43] Sekarreporter: கடந்த 1980களில் வெளியான 20 தமிழ் திரைப்படங்களின் இசையை பயன்படுத்த விதிக்கப்பட்ட தடையை எதிர்த்து, பிரபல இசையமைப்பாளர் இளையராஜா தாக்கல் செய்த மேல் முறையீட்டு மனுவுக்கு பதிலளிக்கும் படி, இந்தியன் ரெக்கார்டு கம்பெனி உள்ளிட்ட இரு மியூசிக் நிறுவனங்களுக்கு நோட்டீஸ் அனுப்ப சென்னை...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com