You may also like...
-
Today the Hon’ble Division bench consisting of Lordships Dr.Justice.Vineeth Kothari & Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000/- against one Mr. B.Ramkumar Adityan, a practcing advocate for filing frivolous PIL Writ petitions one after another by taking note his previous antecedents. It was brought to the notice of the court by State Government Pleader V.Jayaprakash Narayanan that he is a member of political party and he has filed many cases without any sufficient cause and without doing any research on the issue as per decision of Supreme court
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 13, 2020
-
Madras high court news sekarreporter
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 6, 2021
-
Sekarreporter Today law points 3.02.2021, K. Selvaraj, MHC Advocate: Earlier, the inclusion of an Act in 9th Schedule validates it with retrospective effect from the date of its enactment, irrespective of its inconsistency with any fundamental right. Acts added to the 9th Schedule on or after 24.4.1973 will not receive the protection of Article 31B. They will be valid only if they do not damage or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution. (1981) 2 SCC 362 Wamana Rao -vs- UOI (2007) 2 SCC 1 I.R. Coelho -vs- State of Tamil Nadu
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 3, 2021