Karthic chithambaram it quashed order mhc sathia kumar j full order discharge allowed

by Sekar Reporter · December 11, 2020

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17bkCYypwnwtIF5LEyOgkxlS_iwjdOs2d/view?usp=drivesdk

You may also like...

• 

  1: Cont.P.Nos.1307 & 1308 of 2019 V.BHARATHIDASAN,J. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. D.Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader, filed a status report stating that now pursuant to the complaint given by the Deputy Collector, a case has been registered against four persons in Crime No.193 of 2019 by the

  November 1, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 1, 2020

• 

  Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. In continuation of our earlier order dated 18.06.2021, we pass the following order: 2 Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan, learned Amicus Curiae and Mr.S.Sethuraman and Mr. M. Ilayaraja, Assistant Chief Nodal Officers are present. Further, except Mr. V. John Mino, Sessions Judge, Dindigul, who was appointed as the District Nodal Officer for Dindigul, the remaining 33 District Nodal Officers appointed vide our earlier order dated 18.06.2021, participated in the hearing via Video Conferencing and stated that they have received the 3-member Sub Judge Committee report and the report of the High Court Inspection Team and that they have taken print outs of the same and made them as booklets. They further stated that they have appointed the required number of Assistant Nodal Officers in their respective districts. 3 Mr. R. Joseph Joy, Family Judge, Kanyakumari, stated that he is, at present, holding additional charge of three Courts, viz., the Special Court under the POCSO Act, the Mahila Court and the Additional District Court, Padmanabhapuram and therefore, he requested that he may be permitted to have the assistance of a Judicial Officer of the rank of a Sub Judge.

  July 6, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 6, 2021

• 

  senior counsel Satish Parasaran, representing Sriranganathar Temple management, said he would prefer to contest the case through virtual hearing since his father was an aged person. The senior counsel did not want to take any risk by attending physical hearing of cases.

  September 5, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 5, 2020