You may also like...
-
“division bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice K K Ramakrishnan observed that on perusal of the documents, they found no merit in the petition and deemed it a frivolous petition under the guise of public interest litigation. When this was pointed out to the petitioner’s counsel, he insisted on making his submissions. Even after his submissions, the judges were not convinced that public interest was involved in this matter.” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/hc-imposes-cost-on-litigant-for-frivolous-plea/articleshow/125893792.cms#:~:text=division%20bench%20of,in%20this%20matter.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 11, 2025
-
-
Senior Advocate Rachna Srivastava, for the petitioner, submitted before a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that the collegium composition was wrong, as Justice Banu was then a judge of the High Court. “The composition of the collegium itself was…she continued to be a judge, she had not joined the transferee High Court,” she submitted. “We can only assure you that the Chief Justice of India and the collegium judges are strong enough to take anything…thank you for advising us on that..” CJI Kant said.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 6, 2026