You may also like...
-
![[09/03, 11:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2030888381622964304 [09/03, 11:54] Meta AI: The Delhi High Court stayed a trial-court direction to take departmental action against the CBI officer who probed the excise-policy case. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma also asked the trial court to hold off the ED case until the HC decides the CBI’s revision plea challenging the discharge of all accused. [09/03, 11:54] sekarreporter1: Delhi HC stays trial court order directing departmental action against CBI officer who investigated the Excise policy case. J Swarana Kanta Sharma also asks the trial court to defer ED case till the HC decides CBI’s revision plea against the discharge of all the accused. [09/03, 11:54] Meta AI: The post reflects the Delhi High Court staying the trial court’s adverse remarks against the CBI officer and asking the trial court to defer the ED proceedings until the HC decides the CBI’s revision plea on the discharge of Kejriwal, Sisodia and others.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[09/03, 11:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2030888381622964304 [09/03, 11:54] Meta AI: The Delhi High Court stayed a trial-court direction to take departmental action against the CBI officer who probed the excise-policy case. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma also asked the trial court to hold off the ED case until the HC decides the CBI’s revision plea challenging the discharge of all accused. [09/03, 11:54] sekarreporter1: Delhi HC stays trial court order directing departmental action against CBI officer who investigated the Excise policy case. J Swarana Kanta Sharma also asks the trial court to defer ED case till the HC decides CBI’s revision plea against the discharge of all the accused. [09/03, 11:54] Meta AI: The post reflects the Delhi High Court staying the trial court’s adverse remarks against the CBI officer and asking the trial court to defer the ED proceedings until the HC decides the CBI’s revision plea on the discharge of Kejriwal, Sisodia and others.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 9, 2026
-
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 23, 2020
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1470 of 2021 V.Prabhakar .. Appellant. For Appellant : Mr.L.Chandra Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. The appellant, if he so chooses, shall submit his further explanation to the second show cause notice, dated 09.10.2020 within 10 days from today and we will make it clear that the appellant will be at liberty to submit his explanation on all aspects of the matter so as to persuade the disciplinary authority to agree/disagree with the findings of the enquiry officer in respect of the charges and the same shall be considered by the respondent on merits, in accordance with law, without in any manner, being influenced by the observations in the second show cause notice about the proposal of penalty; Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.9314 and 10403 of 2021 are closed. (P.U., J.) (D.B.C., J.) .
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 23, 2022