Bar council Cj of mhc

You may also like...

• 

  4.We place on record the submission of the learned Additional Advocate General that they are ready to provide rehabilitation to the petitioner.  Since we are satisfied that the petitioner in occupation in a water body, her possession cannot be recognised. We direct the respondents to forthwith vacate the petitioner and also ensure that there is no re-occupation in future.  In other words, the character of Survey No.3890, Mylapore Taluk as a water body has to be maintained for all times to come.   We notice that the authorities have also been quite inactive in clearing the encroachments in water bodies. Such inaction and indifference will no longer be tolerated.  We direct the first respondent in particular as well as the revenue and corporation officials to enforce the demand set out in the impugned notice.   The petitioner cannot have any cause for grievance as she is not going to be rendered roofless.  She can very well move into a newly constructed tenement.  5.With this observation and direction to the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed.  No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.                    (G.R.S.,J)        &         (V.L.N,J)                   10.06.2025

  June 11, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 11, 2025

• 

  NGT, not HC, can hear matters relating to law on environment protection’

  January 14, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2021

• 

  தன்னை குண்டர் சட்டத்தில் சிறையில் அடைத்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்யக் கோரி பப்ஜி மதன் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத் தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளார்.

  August 7, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 7, 2021