Ethiraj college case full order

You may also like...

• 

  Rubt Mhc Advt: In Nalini’s phone case I am unaware whether the Ministry of Home and External Affairs are Respondents to the proceedings before the Madras High Court (MHC) in the WP filed

  May 29, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 29, 2020

• 

  Justice M.Duraiswamy and T.V.Tamilselvi held that even if the assessee is engaged in the category of activity of “object of general public utility”, they are entitled for registration under Section 12A. Therefore, the court held that the assessee can claim registration under Section 12A by categorising the activity of the assessee as “object of general public utility”. “In these circumstances, we do not find any error or irregularity in the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. We find no ground much less any substantial question of law to interfere with the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,” the court while dismissing the appeal said.

  February 10, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2021

• 

  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.32592 of 2016   M.Muthu            …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Dr.R.Gowri                                                               For M/s.R.Meenakshi                     For Respondents           : Mr.A.Murugan                                                               Central Government Standing   Counsel The 1st respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectively implemented and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

  November 18, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 18, 2022