![[5/10, 08:54] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/31BeAxONC3k [5/10, 09:24] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/05/10/watch-ag%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%81-mba-president-arl-sundaresan-sir-%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%81-on-youtube/](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story New Govt advts with law minister
- Previous story Madras HC adjourns the plea for registration of a criminal case for corruption charges against LA Minister S.P. Velumani to 23 January. Senior Counsel NR Elango who argued on behalf of DMK impressed upon the court that DVAC cannot examine witnesses in a Preliminary Enquiry & the DVAC’s stand that they have examined several witnesses in this connection is against DVAC manual. The only option before DVAC is to register a criminal case and conduct proper investigation he added. DVAC’s S.P. Ponni who conducted the PE reported to the court that PE has been completed and report has been sent to Director DVAC. The tone of arguments advanced by DVAC indicated that the PE against Velumani is closed. Madras HC directed Director of DVAC to submit all documents, statements, reports before HC on 23.01.2020 to decide next course of action.
Recent Posts
- Advocate vijayan subramaniyam தனுஷ் வக்கீல் பேட்டி
- The court was hearing a clutch of petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into the alleged potential targeting of activists, journalists, politicians, judges and government officials using the Israeli spyware. https://www.theleaflet.in/allegations-serious-if-reports-are-correct-supreme-court-on-pegasus-row/
- Unprecedented Suit for damages filed by I.F.S. Officer against I.A.S. Officers for Rupees One Crore and One Thousand as token damage. Plaintiff: D.Ramachandran IFS (V.Retd) Through Counsel M.Ravi & Priya Ravi Summons issued by High Court, Madras IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
- Full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.07.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ ADVOCATE: M.Ravi & Priya Ravi, argued in a case relating to promotion to the post of Deputy Inspector General of Prison and the Order of Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Govindaraj : The Petitioner to make a representation setting out all the grounds with substantiating materials as well as judicial precedents to the 1st respondent within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same and after forming appropriate opinion as to the objects and reasons of the classifications particularly between the General Category and Women Category, pass a reasoned appropriate order within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
- தனுஸ் வழக்கு full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 05.08.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.33800 of 2015 Mr.K.Dhanush .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Secretary,
More
Recent Posts
- Advocate vijayan subramaniyam தனுஷ் வக்கீல் பேட்டி
- The court was hearing a clutch of petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into the alleged potential targeting of activists, journalists, politicians, judges and government officials using the Israeli spyware. https://www.theleaflet.in/allegations-serious-if-reports-are-correct-supreme-court-on-pegasus-row/
- Unprecedented Suit for damages filed by I.F.S. Officer against I.A.S. Officers for Rupees One Crore and One Thousand as token damage. Plaintiff: D.Ramachandran IFS (V.Retd) Through Counsel M.Ravi & Priya Ravi Summons issued by High Court, Madras IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
- Full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.07.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ ADVOCATE: M.Ravi & Priya Ravi, argued in a case relating to promotion to the post of Deputy Inspector General of Prison and the Order of Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Govindaraj : The Petitioner to make a representation setting out all the grounds with substantiating materials as well as judicial precedents to the 1st respondent within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same and after forming appropriate opinion as to the objects and reasons of the classifications particularly between the General Category and Women Category, pass a reasoned appropriate order within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
- தனுஸ் வழக்கு full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 05.08.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.33800 of 2015 Mr.K.Dhanush .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Secretary,
