Category: Uncategorized

S. Raviji appeared on behalf of B. Jagannath, Counsel for Petitioner [28/05, 10:57] sekarreporter1: [28/05, 06:23] Bjp Adv Ramoorrhy Mhc: WP filed by TR Ramesh challenging the amendment to the Rule brought in by TN Government permitting the investment of surplu

[28/05, 10:57] sekarreporter1: S. Raviji appeared on behalf of B. Jagannath, Counsel for Petitioner [28/05, 10:57] sekarreporter1: [28/05, 06:23] Bjp Adv Ramoorrhy Mhc: WP filed by TR Ramesh challenging the amendment to the Rule...

Justice Swaminathan says, his Bench intends to pass orders on the HCP on Friday. He asks whether Mr. Arun wants to say something. Mr. Arun says, the detainee (a realtor) had been accused of forging signatures of the complainant. Justice Swaminathan says, the question is whether the invocation of the Goondas Act is justified. The judge says the court has also been following the track record of Mr. Arun in invoking preventive detention law. However, Mr. Arun says in his 28 years of service, there had not been any misuse of official position. JUDGES RESERVE ORDERS ON THE HCP.

Justice Swaminathan says, his Bench intends to pass orders on the HCP on Friday. He asks whether Mr. Arun wants to say something. Mr. Arun says, the detainee (a realtor) had been accused of...

[27/05, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Orders reserved [27/05, 16:47] sekarreporter1: [27/05, 16:46] sekarreporter1: Justice Lakshminarayanan says, while examining a preventive detention order, the court has to deal with the liberty of citizens. If someone had committed criminal offences, he/she should be dealt with strictly under the regular criminal laws, he says. [27/05, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Orders reserved

[27/05, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Orders reserved [27/05, 16:47] sekarreporter1: [27/05, 16:46] sekarreporter1: Justice Lakshminarayanan says, while examining a preventive detention order, the court has to deal with the liberty of citizens. If someone had committed...

Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt commence hearing the case related to Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption V. Arun after a second pass over. Government Counsel (criminal side) R. John Sathyan is arguing on behalf of the IPS officer. Judges say the detainee may not be a paragon of virtue but the point is whether the detention order passed by the IPS officer is right or not.

Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt commence hearing the case related to Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption V. Arun after a second pass over. Government Counsel (criminal side) R. John Sathyan...

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.(MD).Nos.7350, 21789 & 25923 of 2022 & W.P.(MD)No.17294 of 2020 & W.A.(MD)Nos.1191, 1192 & 1159 to 1165 of 2020 & W.P.Nos.16349 of 2023 & W.P.Nos.14645 & 14646 of 2016 & W.P.No.20152 of 2020 & W.P.No.21013 of 2024 and W.A.Nos.457 & 459 of 2026 and connected miscellaneous petitions [W.P.(MD).No.7350 of 2022] 1. M.Mahendran 2. K.Chithravel .. Petitioners Vs. 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Through its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai – 9. 2. The Director General of Police O/o. The Director General of Police Post Box No.601, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Pronounced on 27.04.2026 27.05.2026 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.(MD).Nos.7350, 21789 & 25923 of 2022 & W.P.(MD)No.17294...

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-uphelds-levy-of-gst-on-online-gaming-fantasy-games-535908 [27/05, 16:15] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax on online gaming activities as constitutionally valid, and rejected the constitutional and statutory challenge mounted against the levy of CGST on actionable claims arising from betting and gambling transactions.

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-uphelds-levy-of-gst-on-online-gaming-fantasy-games-535908 [27/05, 16:15] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax on online gaming activities as constitutionally valid, and rejected the constitutional and statutory challenge mounted against the levy of CGST on actionable claims arising from betting and gambling transactions.

[27/05, 16:15] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-uphelds-levy-of-gst-on-online-gaming-fantasy-games-535908 [27/05, 16:15] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax on online gaming activities as constitutionally valid, and rejected the constitutional and statutory challenge mounted against...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com