Category: Uncategorized

Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/29 WP/13915/2024 (Gen. Misc.) SHRI DURAI MURUGAN KATHIR ANAND VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER. M/S. R.SIVARAMAN P.RAMESHKUMAR RAGHAV RAJEEV MENON VEERABATHRAN PRASANTH M S. GAUTHAM VENKATA NARAYANAN —————— M/S. M.SHEELA, SPL. P.P FOR R1, R2 MEMO DT 03/06/2024 [05/12, 12:03] Sekarreporter: What happen [05/12, 12:03] Sekarreporter: please Update

[05/12, 10:44] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/29 WP/13915/2024 (Gen. Misc.) SHRI DURAI MURUGAN KATHIR ANAND VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER. M/S. R.SIVARAMAN P.RAMESHKUMAR RAGHAV RAJEEV MENON VEERABATHRAN PRASANTH M S. GAUTHAM VENKATA NARAYANAN...

[06/12, 11:03] Sekarreporter: AFTER DIVISION BENCH  06/PVJ/1 TO REJECT THE PETITION OA/900/2025 IN ELP 1/2025 T.R.BAALU VS R. SRIDHAR M/S. P.WILSON ASSOCIATES —————— M/S. PAUL KANAGARAJ S.S.RAJESH P.K.DEEPA DIVYAVARTHINI COUNTER NOT FILED [06/12, 11:03] Sekarreporter: Update

[06/12, 11:03] Sekarreporter: AFTER DIVISION BENCH 06/PVJ/1 TO REJECT THE PETITION OA/900/2025 IN ELP 1/2025 T.R.BAALU VS R. SRIDHAR M/S. P.WILSON ASSOCIATES —————— M/S. PAUL KANAGARAJ S.S.RAJESH P.K.DEEPA DIVYAVARTHINI COUNTER NOT FILED [06/12, 11:03] Sekarreporter: Update

[06/12, 11:03] Sekarreporter: AFTER DIVISION BENCH 06/PVJ/1 TO REJECT THE PETITION OA/900/2025 IN ELP 1/2025 T.R.BAALU VS R. SRIDHAR M/S. P.WILSON ASSOCIATES —————— M/S. PAUL KANAGARAJ S.S.RAJESH P.K.DEEPA DIVYAVARTHINI COUNTER NOT FILED [06/12, 11:03]...

Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi analysed the nature of the Power of Attorney and the application of Sections 201, 202, and 206 of the Indian Contract Act.

[06/12, 10:57] Sekarreporter: https://lawtrend.in/power-of-attorney-coupled-with-interest-does-not-lapse-on-death-of-one-principal-madras-high-court/ [06/12, 10:57] Sekarreporter: [06/12, 10:56] Sekarreporter: ” VIP MEMBER LOGIN HomeJudgements JUDGEMENTS Power of Attorney ‘Coupled With Interest’ Does Not Lapse on Death of One Principal: Madras High Court ₹...

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN. *Court Observation:* The court is considering appeals against an order dated 30.10.2025, where a learned Single Judge dismissed applications under Section 9 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief. The Single Judge held that Section 9 applications are not maintainable during the pendency of Execution Proceedings before a competent Civil Court. The appellants argue that Section 9 applications are maintainable even after an arbitral award is passed and before its enforcement under Section 36 of the Act.

[06/12, 09:34] Meta AI: The Madras High Court judgment you’re referring to involves appeals against an order dated 30.10.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in Original Application Nos. 997 and 998 of 2025...

Setaside HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN OSA(CAD) Nos.118, 119, 135 & 136 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 27672, 27666, 27675, 27678, 29773, 29775, 29780 & 29782 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN OSA(CAD) Nos.118, 119, 135 & 136 of 2025 AND CMP NO....

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com