Category: Uncategorized

issuance of legal heirship certificate in respect of his mother as even the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 came into force only in the year 1969, prior to which, the registration of death was not mandatory. Admittedly, the petitioner is aged about 78 years old and his father died in the year 1951 and therefore, insisting upon the production of the death certificate for the said period is wholly impermissible.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2026 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.9689 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.10451 of 2026 S.Mahalingam                       …   Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Velachery...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

While re-consideration, the respondent is directed to take note of the observations made hereinabove that GST will not be included in the turnover in any of the GST returns.  This is because the definition of the turnover under the GST Law, it has been clearly spelt out that the turnover will not include all the taxes. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.   No costs.  Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :23.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.36025 of 2025 and WMP(MD) Nos.28632 and 28634 of 2025 Global Poly Bags Industries Pvt Ltd., Represented by...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

23.Therefore, we are of the considered view that there is no infirmity found in the judgment and decree passed by the learned Single Judge, warrants any interference by this Court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 11.03.2026 Pronounced on  23.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A(CAD).No.65 of 2022 1.M/s.Photon Factory    Rep....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

   In light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Tirunelveli District in S.C.No.780 of 2017 dated 27.02.2023 and 28.02.2023 and accordingly, this criminal appeal stands dismissed. [N.A.V., J.]            [P.D.B., J.]

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON             : 16.03.2026 PRONOUNCED ON     :  18.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl. A(MD)No.1037 of 2023 Navaneethakrishnan    : Appellant(s)...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order that had been passed on account of a fundamental misreading of the statutory definition of “turnover” under the GST Act

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order; Holds Collected Cannot Be Included in Turnover Under GST Law Case: Global Poly Bags Industries Pvt Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner (St), Virudhunagar...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

               S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  No(s).  9877/2026 [Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 20-02-2026 in WP No. 6719/2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras] M/S. PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI                         Petitioner(s)                      

ITEM NO.29               COURT NO.1               SECTION XII S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNevhL5Mmzo4fcyuZDo_qMt87IZxcjSxL?si=YUoWSuIXcE_KVhEY [23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: சாத்தான்குளம் வழக்கு – 9 போலீசாரும் குற்றவாளிகள் என நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

[23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNevhL5Mmzo4fcyuZDo_qMt87IZxcjSxL?si=YUoWSuIXcE_KVhEY [23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: சாத்தான்குளம் வழக்கு – 9 போலீசாரும் குற்றவாளிகள் என நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

[23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNevhL5Mmzo4fcyuZDo_qMt87IZxcjSxL?si=YUoWSuIXcE_KVhEY [23/03, 17:28] sekarreporter1: சாத்தான்குளம் வழக்கு – 9 போலீசாரும் குற்றவாளிகள் என நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version